Levitate Security Assessment

CFO

Business risk assessment is urgent: Levitate.ai presents unacceptable business risk that could substantially impair operational continuity and introduce significant compliance vulnerabilities.

Our comprehensive vendor security assessment reveals critical deficiencies across multiple domains. With an overall security score of 32/100 - categorized as a " D" grade - this platform demonstrates profound security weaknesses that make it inappropriate for enterprise procurement.

Key business risk indicators include:

• Zero substantive security certifications (No SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, or HIPAA compliance)
• Complete absence of foundational security controls across identity access, data protection, and infrastructure security
• Extremely low AI integration readiness score of 15/100, signaling substantial technological immaturity
• Pricing model lacks transparency (" Contact for pricing"), suggesting potential hidden operational costs

The AI readiness score of 15 is particularly alarming. For a 5,000-employee enterprise seeking robust technological solutions, this indicates a vendor unlikely to provide enterprise-grade security or scalable infrastructure. The zero scores across critical security dimensions - identity management, encryption, compliance frameworks - represent fundamental operational risks.

Procurement Recommendation: REJECT. The security posture presents such extensive vulnerabilities that pursuing this vendor would introduce unacceptable enterprise risk. The lack of basic security certifications, combined with a near-total absence of security controls, makes Levitate.ai incompatible with standard enterprise risk management protocols.

Alternative strategy: Immediately initiate vendor re-evaluation process, seeking platforms with demonstrable security maturity, comprehensive compliance certifications, and robust AI integration capabilities.

Priority next steps:

• Conduct comprehensive vendor security assessment
• Develop stringent vendor selection criteria
• Explore alternative solutions with stronger security foundations

This platform is fundamentally non-compliant with enterprise security requirements.

CTO/Developer

Technical integration with Levitate presents significant risks that demand comprehensive remediation before any enterprise deployment.

From a technical architecture perspective, this platform introduces unacceptable security vulnerabilities. With an overall security score of 32 and a D grade, Levitate demonstrates critical deficiencies across fundamental security dimensions. Zero scores in core security domains like identity access, encryption, compliance, and infrastructure network represent catastrophic integration risks.

Key technical integration concerns include:

• Complete absence of standard enterprise security certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001)
• AI integration readiness score of 15/100, indicating minimal secure AI interaction capabilities
• Lack of documented authentication and access management protocols
• No observable infrastructure security controls
• Minimal developer documentation suggesting immature technical ecosystem

The AI readiness score of 15 is particularly alarming. For a 5,000-employee enterprise requiring robust, secure AI integration, Levitate fails to demonstrate even baseline technical safeguards. The platform's API documentation, while present, likely represents a surface-level implementation without substantive security considerations.

Vendor risk management assessment reveals profound architectural weaknesses. Zero scores across security dimensions suggest systemic technical design failures rather than isolated implementation gaps. The absence of compliance certifications further compounds integration complexity and potential regulatory exposure.

CTO Recommendation: Categorically reject Levitate for enterprise integration. The security posture represents an unacceptable technical risk profile that would introduce substantial vulnerabilities into our technology ecosystem. Any consideration of this platform would require a complete reimplementation of their entire security architecture - an effort likely exceeding the platform's inherent business value.

Immediate actions: Conduct a comprehensive vendor security assessment and identify alternative solutions with demonstrable security engineering maturity.

Legal/Compliance

Levitate AI presents unacceptable compliance risk that could expose our organization to significant regulatory vulnerabilities and potential legal liability. With an overall security score of 32 and a D-grade assessment, this platform fails to meet minimum enterprise security standards across critical regulatory domains.

Our comprehensive legal risk assessment reveals alarming compliance deficiencies. The vendor lacks fundamental certification standards essential for enterprise-grade data protection: no SOC 2 certification, no ISO 27001 compliance, zero GDPR conformance, and no HIPAA validation. These omissions represent substantial legal exposure, particularly for a 5,000-employee enterprise handling sensitive corporate data.

The zero-score across critical compliance dimensions - identity access, data protection, privacy controls - signals systemic regulatory risk. Under GDPR Article 32, organizations must implement " appropriate technical and organizational measures" to ensure data security. Levitate AI demonstrates no evidence of such measures, potentially triggering significant regulatory penalties. The EU's GDPR can impose fines up to €20 million or 4% of global annual turnover for non-compliance.

Similarly, for enterprises handling healthcare or financial data, the platform's complete absence of HIPAA and SOC 2 certifications represents a critical barrier to adoption. These certifications aren't optional - they're fundamental risk mitigation instruments that validate an organization's commitment to data protection and privacy governance.

Legal Recommendation: Categorically NOT recommended for enterprise deployment. The compliance risk profile far exceeds acceptable thresholds. Any potential engagement would require:

1. Comprehensive third-party security audit
2. Extensive contractual protections
3. Strict data processing agreements
4. Continuous compliance monitoring

The vendor's AI integration security score of 15/100 further underscores systemic vulnerabilities, introducing additional legal and regulatory complexity. Our recommendation is definitive: reject this vendor and pursue alternative solutions with robust compliance frameworks.