AgencyAnalytics Security Assessment
Marketing & Advertising
Agency Analytics (formerly MySEOTool) is a marketing platform designed for agencies and marketing consultants. The brandable drag-and-drop dashboard integrates SEO Tools (rank tracking, backlink monitor, site audit), PPC data, Social Media, Web Analytics and more.
9-Dimension Security Framework
Identity & Access Management
API Security
AI Integration Security
NEWInfrastructure Security
Data Protection
Vulnerability Management
Breach History
AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)
Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.
Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 08:46 AM
Assessment Transparency
See exactly what data backs this security assessment
Data Coverage
4/8 security categories assessed
Score based on 4 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.
Evaluation Friction
Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.
Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility
Comprehensive Security Analysis
In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations
Security Analysis
Executive Summary
| Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Security Grade | D+ | Needs Improvement |
| Risk Level | High | Not recommended |
| Enterprise Readiness | 44% | Gaps Exist |
| Critical Gaps | 0 | None |
Security Assessment
| Category | Score | Status | Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟢 Breach History | 100/100 | excellent | Maintain current controls |
| 🟡 Vulnerability Management | 85/100 | good | Maintain current controls |
| 🟠 Identity & Access Management | 35/100 | needs_improvement | URGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately |
| 🟠 API Security | 30/100 | needs_improvement | Add rate limiting and authentication |
| 🟠 Infrastructure Security | 30/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
| 🟠 Data Protection | 20/100 | needs_improvement | Implement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more |
Overall Grade: D+ (35/100)
Critical Security Gaps
| Gap | Severity | Business Impact | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟢 No dedicated security documentation page | LOW | Extended due diligence process | Request security whitepaper or public audit reports |
Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0
Compliance Status
| Framework | Status | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| ISO 27001 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| GDPR | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| HIPAA | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
| PCI DSS | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.
Operational Excellence
| Metric | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Status Page | ❌ Not Found | N/A |
| Documentation Quality | ❌ 0/10 | No SDKs |
| SLA Commitment | ✅ Published | Formal SLA available |
| API Versioning | ⚠️ None | No version control |
| Support Channels | ℹ️ 2 channels | Email, Chat |
Operational Facts Extracted: 7 data points from operational_maturity enrichment
Integration Requirements
| Aspect | Details | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Time | 3-5 days (manual setup required) | Estimated deployment timeline |
| Known Issues | Manual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls needed | Implementation considerations |
⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration
Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:
- Marketing data (email lists, campaign performance, subscriber behavior)
- Customer engagement data (clicks, opens, conversions)
- Lead scoring and qualification data
Risk Level: HIGH - Contains personally identifiable information (PII)
Compliance Requirements:
- GDPR - General Data Protection Regulation (EU)
- CCPA - California Consumer Privacy Act (US)
- SOC 2 Type II - Security, Availability, Processing Integrity
Compliance & Certifications
API Intelligence
Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for AgencyAnalytics.
API Intelligence
API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.
Incomplete API Intelligence
Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.
View Vendor DocumentationAI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis
LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.
CISO
This platform demonstrates good security maturity with solid identity controls but concerning gaps in critical security domains. For a 5,000-employee enterprise, AgencyAnalytics requires enhanced due diligence before production deployment.
Primary Security Concerns
The most significant risk is the absence of data across seven critical security dimensions. Encryption and data protection controls show zero visibility, creating substantial risk for enterprise data handling. Without documented encryption standards, data-at-rest and in-transit protections remain unknown. Compliance frameworks show no validation - lacking SOC 2, ISO 27001, and GDPR compliance documentation creates immediate regulatory exposure for enterprise deployments.
Application security and infrastructure network controls lack assessment data, preventing evaluation of code security practices and network segmentation capabilities. This creates blind spots in fundamental security architecture. Vendor risk management and threat intelligence capabilities show no documentation, limiting our ability to assess their security program maturity and incident response capabilities.
The positive signal comes from identity and access management, scoring 70/100, indicating functional authentication controls and user management capabilities. However, without multi-factor authentication verification or privileged access management details, even this strength requires validation. No breach history provides some confidence in their security track record, though limited visibility into their security program makes this assessment incomplete.
CISO Recommendation
Conditional approval requiring comprehensive security questionnaire completion before procurement. Mandate detailed documentation for encryption practices, compliance certifications, and infrastructure security controls. Implement enhanced monitoring through security information sharing agreements and require quarterly security attestations. Consider this vendor only for non-critical workloads until full security program visibility is established through third-party security assessment.
Security Posture & Operational Capabilities
Comprehensive assessment of AgencyAnalytics's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.
Operational Maturity
Support, SLAs, and documentation quality
Support Channels
Security Automation APIs
Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about AgencyAnalytics
AgencyAnalytics receives a security score of 35/100, positioning it with a D+ grade in our comprehensive SaaS security assessment. The platform demonstrates significant opportunities for security enhancement across multiple critical dimensions. Identity and Access Management, a core security pillar, scores 35/100, indicating substantial room for improvement. Similarly, API Security and Infrastructure Security both score 30/100, highlighting potential vulnerabilities in technical infrastructure.
Data Protection presents the most critical area of concern, scoring just 20/100, which suggests potential risks in data handling and safeguarding mechanisms. However, the platform shows strength in Vulnerability Management, scoring 85/100, and maintains a perfect 100/100 Breach History score.
Security decision-makers should carefully review these scores and consider implementing robust security measures. For a detailed breakdown of AgencyAnalytics's security posture, see the Security Dimensions section on this page.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
AgencyAnalytics presents a mixed security landscape with a D+ overall security score of 35/100, signaling significant areas requiring immediate security enhancement. The platform demonstrates notable weakness across critical security dimensions: Identity & Access Management, API Security, and Infrastructure Security each score around 30-35, categorized as "needs improvement".
Data Protection emerges as a particular concern, scoring only 20/100, which suggests potential vulnerabilities in sensitive information handling. In contrast, Vulnerability Management shows unexpected strength at 85/100, and the platform maintains a perfect Breach History score of 100/100.
Security decision-makers should carefully review these dimensional scores, especially focusing on improving Identity & Access Management and Data Protection mechanisms. While the overall security posture appears fragile, the strong Vulnerability Management indicates potential for rapid security improvements.
For comprehensive security insights, refer to the Security Dimensions section for detailed assessments.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
AgencyAnalytics presents significant security challenges for financial data, with an overall security score of 35/100 and a D+ grade. Critical security dimensions like Identity & Access Management (35/100), API Security (30/100), and Data Protection (20/100) require substantial improvements. While the platform demonstrates strong Vulnerability Management (85/100) and an unblemished Breach History, the low scores in fundamental security areas raise substantial concerns for financial data handling.
Financial teams considering AgencyAnalytics should conduct thorough due diligence. The platform's weak Infrastructure Security (30/100) and limited Access Management capabilities suggest potential risks in protecting sensitive financial information. Organizations handling confidential financial data should implement additional security controls or seek alternative solutions with more robust security frameworks.
For comprehensive security insights, refer to the Security Dimensions section on the platform's detailed security assessment page.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
AgencyAnalytics presents significant infrastructure security challenges with an overall security score of 35/100, earning a D+ grade. Critical vulnerabilities exist across multiple security dimensions, particularly in Identity & Access Management (35/100), API Security (30/100), and Infrastructure Security (30/100). The platform's Data Protection score of 20/100 indicates substantial risk for potential data compromise. While Vulnerability Management demonstrates a strong 85/100 score and no recorded breach history, these isolated strengths cannot compensate for broader systemic weaknesses. Security decision-makers should conduct thorough due diligence before integrating AgencyAnalytics into sensitive workflow environments. Organizations requiring robust cloud security might need to implement additional compensating controls or seek alternative solutions with more comprehensive security architecture. See Security Dimensions section for a detailed breakdown of each risk category.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
AgencyAnalytics presents significant security risks for enterprise deployment, with a low security score of 35/100 and a concerning D+ grade. The platform exhibits critical compliance gaps across major enterprise security standards, including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS certifications. These comprehensive compliance shortfalls indicate substantial potential vulnerabilities that could expose sensitive organizational data.
Security decision-makers should exercise extreme caution before approving AgencyAnalytics for enterprise use. The platform's minimal security posture suggests potential risks in data protection, regulatory compliance, and overall information security management. Organizations with stringent security requirements, particularly those handling sensitive customer or financial information, should conduct a comprehensive risk assessment before considering implementation.
For a detailed evaluation of specific security dimensions and potential mitigation strategies, refer to the full security assessment on the AgencyAnalytics profile page.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Compare with Alternatives
How does AgencyAnalytics stack up against similar applications in Marketing & Advertising? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.
| Application | Overall ScoreScore↓ | Grade | AI Security 🤖AI 🤖⇅ | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
45/100🏆 | C+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
44/100 | C | N/A | View ProfileView | |
42/100 | C | N/A | View ProfileView | |
AgencyAnalyticsCurrent | 35/100 | D+ | N/A | |
28/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
25/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
23/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView |
Security Comparison Insight
7 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.