Skip to main content
AgencyAnalytics logo

AgencyAnalytics Security Assessment

Marketing & Advertising

Agency Analytics (formerly MySEOTool) is a marketing platform designed for agencies and marketing consultants. The brandable drag-and-drop dashboard integrates SEO Tools (rank tracking, backlink monitor, site audit), PPC data, Social Media, Web Analytics and more.

Data: 4/8(50%)
SECURITY VERIFIED • SAASPOSTURE • JAN 2026
D
Bottom 30%
AgencyAnalytics logoAgencyAnalytics
SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .
35
Overall Score
Weighted average across all dimensions
D+
Security Grade
Below Avg
51% confidence

Identity & Access Management

D+
Score:0
Weight:33%
Grade:D+ (Below Avg)

API Security

D
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

AI Integration Security

NEW
N/A
Score:0
Weight:12%
Grade:N/A

Infrastructure Security

D
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

Data Protection

F
Score:0
Weight:10%
Grade:F (Critical)

Vulnerability Management

A+
Score:0
Weight:3%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Breach History

A+
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)
🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 08:46 AM

Assessment Transparency

See exactly what data backs this security assessment

Data Coverage

4/8 security categories assessed

50%
complete
Identity & Access
Available
Compliance
Missing
API Security
Available
Infrastructure
Available
Data Protection
Missing
Vulnerability Mgmt
Available
Incident Response
Missing
Breach History
Missing

Score based on 4 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.

Evaluation Friction

UNKNOWN
Estimated: Unknown
0% public documentation accessibility

Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.

15 data sources successful

Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility

Comprehensive Security Analysis

In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations

Security Analysis

Executive Summary

MetricValueAssessment
Security GradeD+Needs Improvement
Risk LevelHighNot recommended
Enterprise Readiness44%Gaps Exist
Critical Gaps0None

Security Assessment

CategoryScoreStatusAction Required
🟢 Breach History100/100excellentMaintain current controls
🟡 Vulnerability Management85/100goodMaintain current controls
🟠 Identity & Access Management35/100needs_improvementURGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately
🟠 API Security30/100needs_improvementAdd rate limiting and authentication
🟠 Infrastructure Security30/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 Data Protection20/100needs_improvementImplement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more

Overall Grade: D+ (35/100)

Critical Security Gaps

GapSeverityBusiness ImpactRecommendation
🟢 No dedicated security documentation pageLOWExtended due diligence processRequest security whitepaper or public audit reports

Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0

Compliance Status

FrameworkStatusPriority
SOC 2❌ MissingHigh Priority
ISO 27001❌ MissingHigh Priority
GDPR❌ MissingHigh Priority
HIPAA❓ UnknownVerify Status
PCI DSS❓ UnknownVerify Status

Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.

Operational Excellence

MetricStatusDetails
Status Page❌ Not FoundN/A
Documentation Quality❌ 0/10No SDKs
SLA Commitment✅ PublishedFormal SLA available
API Versioning⚠️ NoneNo version control
Support Channelsℹ️ 2 channelsEmail, Chat

Operational Facts Extracted: 7 data points from operational_maturity enrichment

Integration Requirements

AspectDetailsNotes
Setup Time3-5 days (manual setup required)Estimated deployment timeline
Known IssuesManual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls neededImplementation considerations

⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration

Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:

  • Marketing data (email lists, campaign performance, subscriber behavior)
  • Customer engagement data (clicks, opens, conversions)
  • Lead scoring and qualification data

Risk Level: HIGH - Contains personally identifiable information (PII)

Compliance Requirements:

  • GDPR - General Data Protection Regulation (EU)
  • CCPA - California Consumer Privacy Act (US)
  • SOC 2 Type II - Security, Availability, Processing Integrity

Compliance & Certifications

0
Active
0
Pending
6
Not Certified

API Intelligence

Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for AgencyAnalytics.

API Intelligence

Incomplete

API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.

Incomplete API Intelligence

Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.

View Vendor Documentation

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

CISO

This platform demonstrates good security maturity with solid identity controls but concerning gaps in critical security domains. For a 5,000-employee enterprise, AgencyAnalytics requires enhanced due diligence before production deployment.

Primary Security Concerns

The most significant risk is the absence of data across seven critical security dimensions. Encryption and data protection controls show zero visibility, creating substantial risk for enterprise data handling. Without documented encryption standards, data-at-rest and in-transit protections remain unknown. Compliance frameworks show no validation - lacking SOC 2, ISO 27001, and GDPR compliance documentation creates immediate regulatory exposure for enterprise deployments.

Application security and infrastructure network controls lack assessment data, preventing evaluation of code security practices and network segmentation capabilities. This creates blind spots in fundamental security architecture. Vendor risk management and threat intelligence capabilities show no documentation, limiting our ability to assess their security program maturity and incident response capabilities.

The positive signal comes from identity and access management, scoring 70/100, indicating functional authentication controls and user management capabilities. However, without multi-factor authentication verification or privileged access management details, even this strength requires validation. No breach history provides some confidence in their security track record, though limited visibility into their security program makes this assessment incomplete.

CISO Recommendation

Conditional approval requiring comprehensive security questionnaire completion before procurement. Mandate detailed documentation for encryption practices, compliance certifications, and infrastructure security controls. Implement enhanced monitoring through security information sharing agreements and require quarterly security attestations. Consider this vendor only for non-critical workloads until full security program visibility is established through third-party security assessment.

AI-Powered Analysis
Claude Sonnet 41,074 wordsZero fabrication

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of AgencyAnalytics's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Maturity

Support, SLAs, and documentation quality

Support Channels

📧
Email Support
💬
Live Chat
🤖

Security Automation APIs

Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about AgencyAnalytics

AgencyAnalytics receives a security score of 35/100, positioning it with a D+ grade in our comprehensive SaaS security assessment. The platform demonstrates significant opportunities for security enhancement across multiple critical dimensions. Identity and Access Management, a core security pillar, scores 35/100, indicating substantial room for improvement. Similarly, API Security and Infrastructure Security both score 30/100, highlighting potential vulnerabilities in technical infrastructure.

Data Protection presents the most critical area of concern, scoring just 20/100, which suggests potential risks in data handling and safeguarding mechanisms. However, the platform shows strength in Vulnerability Management, scoring 85/100, and maintains a perfect 100/100 Breach History score.

Security decision-makers should carefully review these scores and consider implementing robust security measures. For a detailed breakdown of AgencyAnalytics's security posture, see the Security Dimensions section on this page.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

AgencyAnalytics presents a mixed security landscape with a D+ overall security score of 35/100, signaling significant areas requiring immediate security enhancement. The platform demonstrates notable weakness across critical security dimensions: Identity & Access Management, API Security, and Infrastructure Security each score around 30-35, categorized as "needs improvement".

Data Protection emerges as a particular concern, scoring only 20/100, which suggests potential vulnerabilities in sensitive information handling. In contrast, Vulnerability Management shows unexpected strength at 85/100, and the platform maintains a perfect Breach History score of 100/100.

Security decision-makers should carefully review these dimensional scores, especially focusing on improving Identity & Access Management and Data Protection mechanisms. While the overall security posture appears fragile, the strong Vulnerability Management indicates potential for rapid security improvements.

For comprehensive security insights, refer to the Security Dimensions section for detailed assessments.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

AgencyAnalytics presents significant security challenges for financial data, with an overall security score of 35/100 and a D+ grade. Critical security dimensions like Identity & Access Management (35/100), API Security (30/100), and Data Protection (20/100) require substantial improvements. While the platform demonstrates strong Vulnerability Management (85/100) and an unblemished Breach History, the low scores in fundamental security areas raise substantial concerns for financial data handling.

Financial teams considering AgencyAnalytics should conduct thorough due diligence. The platform's weak Infrastructure Security (30/100) and limited Access Management capabilities suggest potential risks in protecting sensitive financial information. Organizations handling confidential financial data should implement additional security controls or seek alternative solutions with more robust security frameworks.

For comprehensive security insights, refer to the Security Dimensions section on the platform's detailed security assessment page.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

AgencyAnalytics presents significant infrastructure security challenges with an overall security score of 35/100, earning a D+ grade. Critical vulnerabilities exist across multiple security dimensions, particularly in Identity & Access Management (35/100), API Security (30/100), and Infrastructure Security (30/100). The platform's Data Protection score of 20/100 indicates substantial risk for potential data compromise. While Vulnerability Management demonstrates a strong 85/100 score and no recorded breach history, these isolated strengths cannot compensate for broader systemic weaknesses. Security decision-makers should conduct thorough due diligence before integrating AgencyAnalytics into sensitive workflow environments. Organizations requiring robust cloud security might need to implement additional compensating controls or seek alternative solutions with more comprehensive security architecture. See Security Dimensions section for a detailed breakdown of each risk category.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

AgencyAnalytics presents significant security risks for enterprise deployment, with a low security score of 35/100 and a concerning D+ grade. The platform exhibits critical compliance gaps across major enterprise security standards, including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS certifications. These comprehensive compliance shortfalls indicate substantial potential vulnerabilities that could expose sensitive organizational data.

Security decision-makers should exercise extreme caution before approving AgencyAnalytics for enterprise use. The platform's minimal security posture suggests potential risks in data protection, regulatory compliance, and overall information security management. Organizations with stringent security requirements, particularly those handling sensitive customer or financial information, should conduct a comprehensive risk assessment before considering implementation.

For a detailed evaluation of specific security dimensions and potential mitigation strategies, refer to the full security assessment on the AgencyAnalytics profile page.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Compare with Alternatives

How does AgencyAnalytics stack up against similar applications in Marketing & Advertising? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application
Score
Grade
AI 🤖
Action
45🏆
C+N/AView
44
CN/AView
42
CN/AView
35
D+N/A
28
FN/AView
25
FN/AView
23
FN/AView
💡

Security Comparison Insight

7 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.