GitHub Security Assessment
Development & DevOps
The world's leading software development platform for code hosting and collaboration
9-Dimension Security Framework
Identity & Access Management
Compliance & Certification
AI Integration Security
NEWAPI Security
Infrastructure Security
Data Protection
Vulnerability Management
Breach History
Incident Response
AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)
Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.
Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 08:46 AM
Assessment Transparency
See exactly what data backs this security assessment
Data Coverage
7/8 security categories assessed
Score based on 7 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.
Evaluation Friction
Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.
Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility
Essential Security Analysis
Based on available security assessment data
API Intelligence
Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for GitHub.
API Intelligence
API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.
Incomplete API Intelligence
Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.
View Vendor DocumentationAI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis
LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.
CISO
GitHub presents an exceptional security posture that meets enterprise deployment standards for our 5,000-employee organization. With an overall security score of 85/100 (Grade A), this platform demonstrates top-tier security practices that align with our enterprise requirements for critical development infrastructure.
The platform exhibits several key security strengths that warrant confidence. The AI integration security capabilities show solid maturity with MCP server availability and comprehensive API documentation, indicating robust developer integration security controls. This is particularly relevant given our increased adoption of AI-powered development tools like GitHub Copilot and automated workflows. The absence of reported breach incidents in recent assessments demonstrates effective operational security controls and incident prevention capabilities. GitHub's infrastructure serves millions of enterprises globally, suggesting battle-tested security architecture capable of handling our scale and threat profile.
However, the security assessment reveals incomplete visibility into several critical security dimensions that require validation through our vendor risk management process. Identity and access management controls, encryption implementations, and compliance certifications lack detailed assessment data. For an enterprise of our size handling proprietary code repositories, we need explicit validation of multi-factor authentication enforcement, role-based access controls, and data encryption at rest and in transit. Additionally, formal compliance certifications (SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001) should be verified directly with GitHub's compliance team to ensure regulatory alignment with our industry requirements.
CISO Recommendation: Acceptable risk for production deployment with standard enterprise controls. Proceed with vendor due diligence to validate identity management capabilities, encryption standards, and compliance certifications. Implement additional monitoring for repository access patterns and integrate with our SIEM for comprehensive visibility. The platform's proven track record and A-grade security rating support deployment for development operations.
Security Posture & Operational Capabilities
Comprehensive assessment of GitHub's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.
Operational Maturity
Support, SLAs, and documentation quality
Data confidence: 60% • Assessed from vendor documentation and public sources
Authentication Data Not Yet Assessed
We haven't collected authentication and authorization data for GitHub yet.
Security Automation APIs
Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about GitHub
GitHub maintains a security score of 54/100, earning a B grade in the SaaSPosture security assessment. The platform demonstrates strong performance in compliance, with certifications including SOC 2 Type 2, CCPA, GDPR, and FedRAMP, indicating robust regulatory adherence. However, the security assessment reveals significant areas for improvement, particularly in API security, infrastructure security, and data protection, which are currently scored at lower levels. Vulnerability management stands out as a strong point with an 85/100 score, showcasing GitHub's commitment to identifying and addressing potential security risks. The platform's compliance certifications provide confidence for enterprise users, but organizations should carefully review the security dimensions to understand potential vulnerabilities. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of GitHub's security posture, helping security decision-makers make informed risk assessments.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
GitHub secures a moderate security posture with a B-grade overall score of 54/100, demonstrating significant variations across security dimensions. The platform excels in Compliance & Certification, achieving a perfect 100/100 score, with key certifications including CCPA, GDPR, FedRAMP, and SOC2 Type2 compliance. However, critical security areas reveal substantial improvement opportunities. API Security and Infrastructure Security both score only 30/100, indicating potential vulnerability risks. Data Protection receives a particularly low 20/100 rating, suggesting robust security enhancement is needed. Vulnerability Management stands out as a strength with an 85/100 score, reflecting effective threat detection capabilities. The platform's Identity & Access Management dimension scores 65/100, positioning it as a moderate performer. See Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of GitHub's security profile, helping security professionals make informed risk assessment decisions.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
GitHub achieves a B-level security rating with a 54/100 overall score, presenting a mixed security profile for financial data protection. While GitHub demonstrates strong compliance with key regulations like CCPA, GDPR, and FedRAMP, and maintains an excellent vulnerability management record, critical security dimensions require significant improvement. API security, infrastructure security, and data protection scores hover around 20-30, indicating substantial security gaps. The platform's Identity and Access Management scores 65/100, suggesting moderate access control capabilities. GitHub's SOC 2 Type 2 certification provides some reassurance, but financial institutions should implement additional security layers before storing sensitive monetary information. Enterprises handling financial data should conduct thorough risk assessments, leverage GitHub's multi-factor authentication, and supplement platform security with robust internal controls. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive security breakdown and recommended mitigation strategies.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Compare with Alternatives
How does GitHub stack up against similar applications in Development & DevOps? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.
| Application | Overall ScoreScore↓ | Grade | AI Security 🤖AI 🤖⇅ | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GitHubCurrent | 54/100🏆 | B | N/A | |
54/100🏆 | B | N/A | View ProfileView | |
49/100 | C+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
40/100 | C | N/A | View ProfileView | |
40/100 | C | N/A | View ProfileView | |
38/100 | D+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
23/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView |
Security Comparison Insight
4 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.
Research Sources
52 citations for GitHub
Data from static JSON · Last enriched: October 8, 2025