Skip to main content
Buffer logo

Buffer Security Assessment

Marketing & Advertising

With Pablo, anyone can create engaging images. No sign-in, no design experience

Data: 3/8(38%)
HIGH Friction
SECURITY VERIFIED • SAASPOSTURE • JAN 2026
C
Top 50%
Buffer logoBuffer
SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .
43
Overall Score
Weighted average across all dimensions
C
Security Grade
Top 50%
65% confidence

Identity & Access Management

A
Score:0
Weight:33%
Grade:A (Top 10%)

Compliance & Certification

F
Score:0
Weight:19%
Grade:F (Critical)

AI Integration Security

NEW
F
Score:0
Weight:12%
Grade:F (Critical)

API Security

A+
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Infrastructure Security

D
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

Data Protection

C
Score:0
Weight:10%
Grade:C (Top 50%)

Vulnerability Management

A+
Score:0
Weight:3%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Breach History

A+
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

A
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A (Top 10%)
🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 06:03 PM

Assessment Transparency

See exactly what data backs this security assessment

Data Coverage

3/8 security categories assessed

38%
complete
Identity & Access
Available
Compliance
Missing
API Security
Available
Infrastructure
Available
Data Protection
Missing
Vulnerability Mgmt
Missing
Incident Response
Missing
Breach History
Missing

Score based on 3 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.

Evaluation Friction

HIGH
Estimated: 4+ weeks
0% public documentation accessibility

Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.

11 data sources successful

Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility

🤖

AI Integration Security

🔒 9th Dimension

Assess whether Buffer is safe for AI agent integration. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards.

🔌

AI Readiness

Infrastructure for AI integration

F
15/100
MCP Available
🔌 MCP Server0/100
👨‍💻 Developer Experience0/100
📚 Documentation50/100
Top Recommendation:
❌ Poor AI readiness - not recommended for AI workflows
🛡️

AI Security

Safety controls for AI agents

F
25.8/100
HIGH_RISK
🔐 Authentication35%
🔒 Access Control25%
👁️ Observability30%
🔏 Data Privacy15%
✅ Excellent Security:
The Buffer API is rate limited to 60 authenticated requests per user per minute. If you make more than 60 requests within a 60 seconds window period, you will receive a HTTP code 429 response.
⚠️ Needs Attention:
No oauth scopes
🛡️Unique Assessment: Evaluating AI agent integration safety helps you make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors

Essential Security Analysis

Based on available security assessment data

43
Security Score
C
Security Grade
0
Compliance Frameworks

Compliance & Certifications

0
Active
0
Pending
6
Not Certified

AI Integration Security Assessment

Industry-first assessment evaluating whether Buffer is safe and ready for AI agent integration. Covers AI security controls and readiness infrastructure for Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP).

AI Integration Security

Industry-first assessment for AI agent safety

F
GRADE
Critical
25.8
AI Security Score
🔐Authentication
35
🛡️Access Control
25
👁️Observability
30
🔒Data Privacy
15
📊Confidence Score
94%
HIGH_RISK

Excellent Security Features

  • The Buffer API is rate limited to 60 authenticated requests per user per minute. If you make more than 60 requests within a 60 seconds window period, you will receive a HTTP code 429 response.
  • Clear rate limiting documentation (60 requests/minute)
  • HTTPS required for all API requests
  • OAuth 2.0 implementation based on IETF draft v20

⚠️Security Gaps & Recommendations

  • No oauth scopes
  • No token expiration
  • No token rotation
  • No service accounts
  • No mfa enforcement
  • No pii redaction
  • No training opt out
  • No data residency
  • No gdpr compliance
  • No read only tokens
ℹ️

AI Integration Security evaluates whether Buffer is safe for AI agent access. This assessment considers authentication strength, access controls, observability capabilities, and data privacy protections when APIs are accessed by AI systems like Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, or custom AI agents.

AI Readiness Assessment

Evaluates readiness for AI agent integration

F
GRADE
Critical
15.0
AI Readiness Score
🔌
MCP Server Availability(40% weight)

Official or community MCP server support

0
👨‍💻
Developer Experience(30% weight)

API docs, SDKs, code examples

0
📚
Documentation Quality(30% weight)

API reference, auth flows, error handling

50

MCP Server Available

community

Buffer supports Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) for secure AI agent integration.

💡Recommendations

  • ❌ Poor AI readiness - not recommended for AI workflows
📊Confidence Score
70%
🕐Last Verified
1/7/2026
ℹ️

AI Readiness measures whether Bufferprovides the infrastructure and developer resources necessary for secure AI agent integration. High readiness indicates official MCP server support, comprehensive API documentation, and developer-friendly tools.

API Intelligence

Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Buffer.

API Intelligence

Incomplete

API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.

Incomplete API Intelligence

Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.

View Vendor Documentation

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of Buffer's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Data Not Yet Assessed

We haven't collected operational maturity data for Buffer yet.

🤖

Security Automation APIs

Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Buffer

The Buffer API provides access to user's pending and sent updates, social media profiles, scheduled times and more.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

API documentation should offer a comprehensive overview of every API endpoint and operation, including parameters, headers, and request and response bodies. It should also thoroughly explain the relevant data models, including their required attributes and any default, minimum, and maximum values.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

To get an access_token you must first have a regstered application. Please note: Buffer no longer supports the creation of new developer apps. A good OAuth library will handle most of these steps for you. You should only need to supply a client ID and secret.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

API documentation should include examples of each call, parameters, and expected responses. Code samples for commonly used languages such as Java, JavaScript, PHP, and Python should be provided. Each API request should be explained in detail, including sample error messages and troubleshooting tips.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Compare with Alternatives

How does Buffer stack up against similar applications in Marketing & Advertising? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application
Score
Grade
AI 🤖
Action
45🏆
C+N/AView
44
CN/AView
BufferCurrent
43
C25.8
35
D+N/AView
28
FN/AView
25
FN/AView
23
FN/AView
💡

Security Comparison Insight

6 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.