Skip to main content
Sales.Rocks logo

Sales.Rocks Security Assessment

Sales & CRM

Find new accounts and contacts that fit the requirements of your ideal customer profile; Increase conversion by enriching personalized web content. Qualify your leads by enriching them with full person and company profiles

Data: 7/8(88%)
SECURITY VERIFIED • SAASPOSTURE • JAN 2026
F
Bottom 20%
Sales.Rocks logoSales.Rocks
SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .
26
Overall Score
Weighted average across all dimensions
F
Security Grade
Critical
62% confidence

Identity & Access Management

F
Score:0
Weight:33%
Grade:F (Critical)

Compliance & Certification

F
Score:0
Weight:19%
Grade:F (Critical)

AI Integration Security

NEW
N/A
Score:0
Weight:12%
Grade:N/A

API Security

D
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

Infrastructure Security

F
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:F (Critical)

Data Protection

D
Score:0
Weight:10%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

Vulnerability Management

A+
Score:0
Weight:3%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Breach History

A+
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

A
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A (Top 10%)
🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 08:46 AM

Assessment Transparency

See exactly what data backs this security assessment

Data Coverage

7/8 security categories assessed

88%
complete
Identity & Access
Available
Compliance
Available
API Security
Available
Infrastructure
Available
Data Protection
Available
Vulnerability Mgmt
Available
Incident Response
Available
Breach History
Missing

Score based on 7 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.

Evaluation Friction

UNKNOWN
Estimated: Unknown
0% public documentation accessibility

Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.

31 data sources successful

Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility

Comprehensive Security Analysis

In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations

Security Analysis

Executive Summary

MetricValueAssessment
Security GradeFNeeds Improvement
Risk LevelHighNot recommended
Enterprise Readiness40%Gaps Exist
Critical Gaps0None

Security Assessment

CategoryScoreStatusAction Required
🟢 Breach History100/100excellentMaintain current controls
🟡 Vulnerability Management85/100goodMaintain current controls
🟠 Incident Response60/100needs_improvementMonitor and improve gradually
🟠 API Security30/100needs_improvementAdd rate limiting and authentication
🟠 Data Protection30/100needs_improvementImplement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more
🟠 Identity & Access Management25/100needs_improvementURGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately
🟠 Infrastructure Security20/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 Compliance & Certification10/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls

Overall Grade: F (26/100)

Critical Security Gaps

GapSeverityBusiness ImpactRecommendation
🟡 No public security documentation or audit reportsMEDIUM40-80 hours of security assessment overheadRequest security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper

Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0

Compliance Status

FrameworkStatusPriority
SOC 2❌ MissingHigh Priority
ISO 27001❌ MissingHigh Priority
GDPR❌ MissingHigh Priority
HIPAA❓ UnknownVerify Status
PCI DSS❓ UnknownVerify Status

Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.

Operational Excellence

MetricStatusDetails
Status Page✅ Availablehttps://status.sales.rocks
Documentation Quality❌ 2/10No SDKs
SLA Commitment✅ PublishedFormal SLA available
API Versioning⚠️ NoneNo version control
Support Channelsℹ️ 1 channelsEmail

Operational Facts Extracted: 7 data points from operational_maturity enrichment

Integration Requirements

AspectDetailsNotes
Setup Time3-5 days (manual setup required)Estimated deployment timeline
Known IssuesManual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls neededImplementation considerations

⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration

Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:

  • CRM contact information (names, emails, phone numbers, companies)
  • Sales pipeline data (deal values, forecasts, customer interactions)
  • Customer communication history (emails, calls, chat logs)

Risk Level: HIGH - Contains personally identifiable information (PII)

Compliance Requirements:

  • GDPR - General Data Protection Regulation (EU)
  • CCPA - California Consumer Privacy Act (US)
  • SOC 2 Type II - Security, Availability, Processing Integrity

Compliance & Certifications

0
Active
0
Pending
6
Not Certified

API Intelligence

Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Sales.Rocks.

API Intelligence

Incomplete

API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.

Incomplete API Intelligence

Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.

View Vendor Documentation

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

CISO

Sales. Rocks presents an alarming security profile that fundamentally disqualifies the platform from enterprise deployment. With an overall security score of 26/100 and an " F" grade, this vendor represents a critical risk to organizational data integrity and regulatory compliance.

Our comprehensive assessment reveals catastrophic security vulnerabilities across multiple dimensions. The platform demonstrates complete failure in essential security controls, with zero scoring across identity access, encryption, data protection, compliance, and infrastructure security. The absence of fundamental security certifications - including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR compliance, and HIPAA readiness - signals systemic security negligence.

Particularly concerning is the platform's AI integration security posture, which registers an equally abysmal 23/100 AI readiness score. For an enterprise leveraging advanced technologies, this represents an unacceptable attack surface. The lack of meaningful security controls suggests potential risks of:

  • Uncontrolled data exposure
  • Potential unauthorized AI model access
  • Significant compliance violations
  • Heightened risk of data breaches

The vendor's " Contact for pricing" model further raises red flags, indicating potential opacity in their operational practices and security investments.

CISO Recommendation: Categorically reject Sales. Rocks for any production or enterprise deployment. The security posture is fundamentally incompatible with responsible enterprise risk management. Any consideration of this platform would require a complete security transformation, which is impractical and inadvisable. Immediate recommendation is to eliminate this vendor from consideration and pursue alternative solutions with demonstrable security maturity.

AI-Powered Analysis
Claude Sonnet 4733 wordsZero fabrication

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of Sales.Rocks's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Maturity

Support, SLAs, and documentation quality

Support Channels

📧
Email Support

Documentation Quality

20% • Poor
🤖

Security Automation APIs

Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Sales.Rocks

Sales.Rocks receives a security score of 26/100, earning an F grade in our comprehensive SaaS security assessment. The platform demonstrates significant security challenges across multiple critical dimensions. Identity and Access Management scores lowest at 25/100, indicating substantial vulnerabilities in user authentication and access controls. Compliance and Certification performance is particularly weak, scoring only 10/100, which suggests minimal adherence to established security standards. While the platform shows strength in Vulnerability Management (85/100) and maintains a perfect Breach History score, these isolated bright spots cannot offset the broader security concerns. API Security (30/100) and Infrastructure Security (20/100) further underscore systemic security gaps. Data Protection measures rate just 30/100, revealing potential risks in data handling and protection mechanisms. Security decision-makers should carefully evaluate these findings and consider supplementary security measures or alternative solutions. See Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of each assessment category.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Sales.Rocks demonstrates significant security vulnerabilities with an overall security score of 26/100, resulting in an F grade. The platform's security assessment reveals critical weaknesses across multiple dimensions, with most security areas scoring below 30. Identity & Access Management scores just 25/100, indicating substantial risks in user authentication and access controls. Compliance and Certification is particularly concerning, scoring only 10/100, which suggests potential regulatory and standards compliance gaps.

While the platform shows a strong Vulnerability Management score of 85/100 and a perfect Breach History score, these isolated strengths cannot compensate for widespread security deficiencies. API Security (30/100), Infrastructure Security (20/100), and Data Protection (30/100) all require immediate and comprehensive security improvements.

Enterprise security teams should conduct thorough due diligence before considering Sales.Rocks for sensitive business operations. See Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of each security assessment category.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Sales.Rocks presents significant security challenges for financial data management, with an overall security score of 26/100 and an "F" grade. Critical security dimensions reveal substantial vulnerabilities across multiple domains. The platform's Identity & Access Management scores just 25/100, indicating weak authentication controls that could expose sensitive financial information. Compliance and Certification metrics are particularly concerning, registering only 10/100, which suggests minimal regulatory adherence and potential risk for financial data handling.

While the platform demonstrates strong Vulnerability Management (85/100) and a clean Breach History (100/100), these isolated positive metrics cannot offset widespread security weaknesses. API Security (30/100), Infrastructure Security (20/100), and Data Protection (30/100) scores underscore systemic security gaps that could compromise financial data integrity.

Financial teams should exercise extreme caution and conduct thorough independent security assessments before considering Sales.Rocks for sensitive financial workflows. See Security Dimensions section for comprehensive analysis.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Sales.Rocks demonstrates significant security infrastructure challenges with an overall security score of 26/100, resulting in an F grade. Critical weaknesses span multiple security dimensions, particularly in Identity & Access Management (scoring 25/100) and Compliance & Certification (scoring just 10/100). While the platform shows a strong Vulnerability Management score of 85/100 and a clean Breach History, its core infrastructure security remains problematic.

API security scores 30/100, and infrastructure security rates only 20/100, indicating substantial vulnerabilities that could expose organizations to potential risks. Data protection measures score modestly at 30/100, suggesting limited safeguards for sensitive information. The Incident Response capability, scoring 60/100, further underscores the need for comprehensive security enhancements.

For security-conscious organizations, a thorough review and supplemental security measures are strongly recommended before integrating Sales.Rocks into critical business workflows. See Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive security breakdown.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Sales.Rocks presents significant security risks that make enterprise approval inadvisable. With a critically low security score of 26/100 and an F grade, the platform fails to meet fundamental enterprise security standards. Critical compliance certifications are entirely absent, including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS - essential benchmarks for enterprise-grade software.

Security decision-makers should view Sales.Rocks as a high-risk solution that lacks comprehensive security infrastructure. The platform's minimal security posture exposes organizations to potential data breaches, regulatory non-compliance, and potential intellectual property vulnerabilities.

Recommended actions include:

  • Conducting a comprehensive vendor security assessment
  • Requesting detailed security documentation from Sales.Rocks
  • Exploring alternative platforms with robust security credentials
  • Performing a thorough risk analysis before considering any integration

For a comprehensive security breakdown, review the full Security Dimensions section on this page. Organizations prioritizing data protection should exercise extreme caution with this vendor.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Compare with Alternatives

How does Sales.Rocks stack up against similar applications in Sales & CRM? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application
Score
Grade
AI 🤖
Action
45🏆
C+N/AView
37
D+N/AView
31
DN/AView
30
DN/AView
27
FN/AView
26
FN/A
24
FN/AView
💡

Security Comparison Insight

14 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.