SafeBase Security Assessment
Security & Compliance
SafeBase is a Trust Center platform designed to streamline security reviews and enhance transparency between businesses and their clients. By automating the sharing of security, compliance, and privacy information, SafeBase helps organizations build trust, reduce the time spent on security questionnaires, and accelerate sales cycles. Its AI-powered Questionnaire Assistance and robust integrations with tools like Salesforce and Slack enable security and sales teams to efficiently manage and communicate their security posture. Key Features and Functionality: - Branded Trust Center: A centralized hub to host security reports, documents, and policies, allowing clients to self-serve information and reducing the need for repetitive inquiries. - AI Questionnaire Assistance: Utilizes artificial intelligence to rapidly process and respond to complex security questionnaires, significantly decreasing manual effort and response time. - Integrations: Seamlessly connects with workplace productivity tools and CRMs, including Slack, Teams, Salesforce, and HubSpot, to embed security reviews into existing workflows. - Analytics: Provides comprehensive insights into security-influenced revenue and buyer engagement metrics, enabling organizations to measure the impact of their security programs. Primary Value and Solutions: SafeBase addresses the common challenge of time-consuming and resource-intensive security reviews by offering a platform that automates and simplifies these processes. By providing a transparent and accessible Trust Center, organizations can proactively share their security posture, reducing the volume of security questionnaires and building customer trust. The AI-powered Questionnaire Assistance further diminishes the burden of responding to security assessments, allowing teams to focus on strategic initiatives. Overall, SafeBase enhances efficiency, accelerates sales cycles, and positions security as a business enabler.
9-Dimension Security Framework
Identity & Access Management
Compliance & Certification
AI Integration Security
NEWAPI Security
Infrastructure Security
Data Protection
Vulnerability Management
Breach History
Incident Response
AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)
Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.
Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 06:10 PM
Assessment Transparency
See exactly what data backs this security assessment
Data Coverage
7/8 security categories assessed
Score based on 7 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.
Evaluation Friction
Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.
Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility
Comprehensive Security Analysis
In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations
Security Analysis
Executive Summary
| Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Security Grade | F | Needs Improvement |
| Risk Level | High | Not recommended |
| Enterprise Readiness | 42% | Gaps Exist |
| Critical Gaps | 0 | None |
Security Assessment
| Category | Score | Status | Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟢 Breach History | 100/100 | excellent | Maintain current controls |
| 🟡 Vulnerability Management | 85/100 | good | Maintain current controls |
| 🟠 Incident Response | 60/100 | needs_improvement | Monitor and improve gradually |
| 🟠 Identity & Access Management | 40/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
| 🟠 API Security | 30/100 | needs_improvement | Add rate limiting and authentication |
| 🟠 Infrastructure Security | 30/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
| 🟠 Data Protection | 30/100 | needs_improvement | Implement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more |
| 🟠 Compliance & Certification | 0/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
Overall Grade: F (29/100)
Critical Security Gaps
| Gap | Severity | Business Impact | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟡 No public security documentation or audit reports | MEDIUM | 40-80 hours of security assessment overhead | Request security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper |
Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0
Compliance Status
| Framework | Status | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| ISO 27001 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| GDPR | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| HIPAA | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
| PCI DSS | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.
Operational Excellence
| Metric | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Status Page | ❌ Not Found | N/A |
| Documentation Quality | ❌ 0/10 | No SDKs |
| SLA Commitment | ❌ None | No public SLA |
| API Versioning | ⚠️ None | No version control |
| Support Channels | ℹ️ 0 channels |
Operational Facts Extracted: 2 data points from operational_maturity enrichment
Integration Requirements
| Aspect | Details | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Time | 3-5 days (manual setup required) | Estimated deployment timeline |
| Known Issues | Manual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls needed | Implementation considerations |
Authentication Capabilities
| Method | Tier Requirement | Evidence Source |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ SSO (SAML/OAuth) | Enterprise | sso_discovery (90% confidence) |
Authentication Facts Extracted: 0 data points from auth_evidence enrichment
⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration
Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:
Risk Level: LOW - Contains
Compliance & Certifications
API Intelligence
Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for SafeBase.
API Intelligence
API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.
Incomplete API Intelligence
Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.
View Vendor DocumentationAI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis
LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.
Security Posture & Operational Capabilities
Comprehensive assessment of SafeBase's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.
Operational Data Not Yet Assessed
We haven't collected operational maturity data for SafeBase yet.
Authentication Data Not Yet Assessed
We haven't collected authentication and authorization data for SafeBase yet.
Security Automation APIs
Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about SafeBase
Manage Trust Center tasks with integrations for Slack, Teams and Jira, streamline DocuSign and Ironclad NDA workflows, and embed Intercom chat tools within your Trust Center. Plus integrate into major
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
SafeBase combines an enterprise-grade Trust Center with powerful AI to accelerate security questionnaire workflows, reduce manual effort, and deliver the trust signals your buyers need — fast. Use AI
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Compare with Alternatives
How does SafeBase stack up against similar applications in Security & Compliance? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.
| Application | Overall ScoreScore↓ | Grade | AI Security 🤖AI 🤖⇅ | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
34/100🏆 | D | N/A | View ProfileView | |
SafeBaseCurrent | 29/100 | F | N/A | |
28/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
27/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
26/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
24/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
23/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView |
Security Comparison Insight
7 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.