ACID Security Assessment

ACID's security posture reveals significant vulnerabilities across critical enterprise technology domains, earning a low security score of 23/100 and an "F" grade. The assessment highlights systemic security challenges, particularly in crucial areas like Compliance & Certification, which registers zero points. Identity & Access Management scores minimally at 25/100, indicating substantial risk for potential unauthorized system access. API and Infrastructure Security hover around 30/100, demonstrating inadequate protective measures. Data Protection performs poorly at 20/100, suggesting potential data integrity and confidentiality risks. Notably, the company demonstrates strength in Vulnerability Management (85/100) and maintains a clean Breach History (100/100), providing minor positive indicators. Security decision-makers should conduct an immediate, comprehensive security review. For a detailed breakdown of ACID's security dimensions, refer to the Security Assessment section on this page, which offers granular insights into each evaluated domain.

ACID demonstrates significant security challenges across multiple critical dimensions. With an overall security score of 23/100 and an F grade, the platform exhibits substantial vulnerabilities. Identity & Access Management scores only 25/100, indicating weak user authentication and access control mechanisms. Compliance & Certification shows zero points, suggesting potential regulatory and standards compliance gaps. API and Infrastructure Security hover around 30/100, revealing substantial risks in system protection and integration security.

Data Protection emerges as another weak point at 20/100, highlighting potential data handling and privacy concerns. Notably, Vulnerability Management represents a rare bright spot with an 85/100 score, indicating robust threat detection capabilities. Breach History receives a perfect 100/100, suggesting no documented historical security incidents.

For comprehensive security insights, refer to the Security Dimensions section, which breaks down each critical assessment parameter for enterprise decision-makers.

ACID's security assessment reveals significant vulnerabilities for financial data management, with an alarming overall security score of 23/100 and an "F" grade. Critical security dimensions show substantial weaknesses: Identity & Access Management scores only 25/100, Compliance & Certification registers zero, and Data Protection rates a mere 20/100. While Vulnerability Management demonstrates a strong 85/100 score and Breach History shows a perfect 100/100, these isolated strengths cannot compensate for systemic security gaps. Financial organizations considering ACID should exercise extreme caution, as the platform's security infrastructure appears inadequate for protecting sensitive financial information. The consistently low scores across multiple security dimensions—including API Security (30/100) and Infrastructure Security (30/100)—suggest fundamental security design challenges. For organizations prioritizing financial data protection, comprehensive security remediation would be essential before considering ACID as a viable solution. See Security Dimensions section for a detailed security breakdown.

ACID's security infrastructure reveals significant vulnerabilities with an overall security score of 23/100, resulting in an F grade that signals substantial risks for potential users. Critical security dimensions demonstrate consistent weaknesses across multiple domains. Identity and Access Management scores just 25/100, indicating minimal safeguards against unauthorized system entry. API and infrastructure security hover around 30/100, presenting potential exploit vectors for malicious actors.

The most concerning metric is Compliance & Certification, which registers a zero score, suggesting complete absence of recognized security standards or third-party validations. Data protection measures score only 20/100, exposing potential data handling and storage risks.

Notably, the company demonstrates strength in breach history and vulnerability management, with scores of 100 and 85 respectively. However, these isolated positives cannot compensate for the comprehensive security gaps. Organizations considering ACID should conduct extensive due diligence and implement robust supplemental security controls.

ACID's security profile presents significant enterprise risk with a critical F-grade security score of 23/100. The application fails to meet fundamental enterprise security standards, missing crucial compliance certifications including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS. Organizations considering ACID for business-critical workflows should exercise extreme caution. The exceptionally low overall score indicates substantial vulnerabilities that could expose sensitive data and compromise organizational security infrastructure. Enterprise security decision-makers should conduct a comprehensive risk assessment before potential integration, recognizing the potential for substantial security gaps. Recommended immediate actions include requesting a detailed security audit directly from ACID, conducting independent penetration testing, and exploring alternative solutions with more robust security credentials. See Security Dimensions section for comprehensive risk analysis and detailed compliance evaluation.