Proposify Security Assessment

Proposify receives a concerning security score of 23/100, resulting in an "F" grade on the SaaSPosture security assessment. The platform demonstrates significant weaknesses across multiple security dimensions, with most areas scoring below 35. Critical security domains like Compliance & Certification show zero score, indicating substantial gaps in meeting industry security standards. Identity & Access Management scores only 25/100, suggesting potential vulnerabilities in user authentication and access controls. While Vulnerability Management and Breach History show stronger performance at 85 and 100 respectively, these isolated high points cannot compensate for systemic security deficiencies. API Security and Infrastructure Security both score under 35, raising serious concerns about potential data exposure and system resilience. Enterprise security teams should conduct thorough additional due diligence before integrating Proposify into sensitive workflows. See Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of each security assessment category.

Proposify's security posture presents significant concerns for financial data management, with an overall security score of just 23/100 and an F grade. Critical security dimensions reveal substantial vulnerabilities, particularly in Compliance & Certification (0/100), Infrastructure Security (20/100), and Identity & Access Management (25/100). Financial teams considering Proposify should exercise extreme caution.

While the platform shows strong performance in Vulnerability Management (85/100) and an excellent Breach History score (100/100), these isolated strengths cannot compensate for fundamental security weaknesses. The low scores across Identity & Access Management and Data Protection (35/100) suggest potential risks in protecting sensitive financial information.

Businesses handling confidential financial documents should thoroughly evaluate alternative platforms with more robust security controls. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of Proposify's security assessment.

Proposify's authentication mechanisms demonstrate significant security limitations, with an Identity & Access Management score of just 25/100. The platform lacks clear multi-factor authentication (MFA) support, leaving user accounts potentially vulnerable to unauthorized access. While the system maintains a clean breach history score of 100, its overall security posture remains critically weak, with an overall grade of F and a total security score of 23/100. Organizations considering Proposify should exercise extreme caution, particularly around access control and user authentication protocols. Enterprise security teams will want to implement additional compensating controls to mitigate the platform's authentication risks. For comprehensive login security details, review the Identity & Access Management section of our full security assessment, which highlights critical areas requiring immediate vendor attention and potential security improvements. See Security Dimensions section for full breakdown of authentication vulnerabilities.

Proposify's infrastructure security presents significant challenges for organizations prioritizing robust cloud security. With an overall security score of 23/100 and an F grade, the platform demonstrates critical vulnerabilities across multiple security dimensions. Key infrastructure security indicators reveal systemic weaknesses: Identity & Access Management scores only 25/100, while Infrastructure Security rates a concerning 20/100. API Security marginally performs at 30/100, indicating potential entry points for potential breaches. Data Protection measures reach just 35/100, underscoring substantial protection gaps. The lone bright spots include Vulnerability Management (85/100) and a clean Breach History (100/100), suggesting proactive incident tracking. Security decision-makers should conduct thorough risk assessments before integrating Proposify into sensitive workflows. See Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of these critical infrastructure security metrics.