Ping Technology Labs LTD Security Assessment

Name: Ping Technology Labs LTD
Rating: 25 (15 reviews)

Security & Compliance

• Static Residential Proxies from Tier 1 ASNs including Spectrum, AT&T Comcast & Telia • Unlimited Bandwidth and Ultra-Fast Speeds • Keep the same IP address for months at a time • 99.98% Uptime + 24/7 365 Support • Perfect for Data Extraction, Account Management, Web Scraping, Social Media & SERP

Data: 7/8(88%)

Visit Website

Bottom 20%

Ping Technology Labs LTD

SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .

Overall Score

Weighted average across all dimensions

Security Grade

Critical

65% confidence

Identity & Access Management

Score:0

Weight:33%

Grade:F (Critical)

Compliance & Certification

Score:0

Weight:19%

Grade:F (Critical)

AI Integration Security

NEW

N/A

Score:0

Weight:12%

Grade:N/A

API Security

Score:0

Weight:14%

Grade:D (Below Avg)

Infrastructure Security

Score:0

Weight:14%

Grade:D (Below Avg)

Data Protection

Score:0

Weight:10%

Grade:C (Top 50%)

Vulnerability Management

A+

Score:0

Weight:3%

Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Breach History

A+

Score:0

Weight:1%

Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

Score:0

Weight:1%

Grade:A (Top 10%)

🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 06:08 PM

Assessment Transparency

See exactly what data backs this security assessment

Data Coverage

7/8 security categories assessed

88%

complete

Identity & Access

Available

Compliance

Available

API Security

Available

Infrastructure

Available

Data Protection

Available

Vulnerability Mgmt

Available

Incident Response

Available

Breach History

Missing

Score based on 7 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.

Evaluation Friction

UNKNOWN

Estimated: Unknown

0% public documentation accessibility

Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.

32 data sources successful

Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility

Comprehensive Security Analysis

In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations

Security Analysis

Executive Summary

Metric	Value	Assessment
Security Grade	F	Needs Improvement
Risk Level	High	Not recommended
Enterprise Readiness	40%	Gaps Exist
Critical Gaps	0	None

Security Assessment

Category	Score	Status	Action Required
🟢 Breach History	100/100	excellent	Maintain current controls
🟡 Vulnerability Management	85/100	good	Maintain current controls
🟠 Incident Response	60/100	needs_improvement	Monitor and improve gradually
🟠 Data Protection	40/100	needs_improvement	Implement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more
🟠 API Security	30/100	needs_improvement	Add rate limiting and authentication
🟠 Infrastructure Security	30/100	needs_improvement	Review and enhance controls
🟠 Identity & Access Management	25/100	needs_improvement	URGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately
🟠 Compliance & Certification	0/100	needs_improvement	Review and enhance controls

Overall Grade: F (25/100)

Critical Security Gaps

Gap	Severity	Business Impact	Recommendation
🟡 No public security documentation or audit reports	MEDIUM	40-80 hours of security assessment overhead	Request security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper

Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0

Compliance Status

Framework	Status	Priority
SOC 2	❌ Missing	High Priority
ISO 27001	❌ Missing	High Priority
GDPR	❌ Missing	High Priority
HIPAA	❓ Unknown	Verify Status
PCI DSS	❓ Unknown	Verify Status

Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.

Operational Excellence

Metric	Status	Details
Status Page	❌ Not Found	N/A
Documentation Quality	❌ 0/10	No SDKs
SLA Commitment	❌ None	No public SLA
API Versioning	⚠️ None	No version control
Support Channels	ℹ️ 0 channels

Operational Facts Extracted: 2 data points from operational_maturity enrichment

Integration Requirements

Aspect	Details	Notes
Setup Time	3-5 days (manual setup required)	Estimated deployment timeline
Known Issues	Manual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls needed	Implementation considerations

⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration

Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:

Risk Level: LOW - Contains

Compliance & Certifications

Active

Pending

Not Certified

API Intelligence

Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Ping Technology Labs LTD.

API Intelligence

Incomplete

API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.

Incomplete API Intelligence

Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.

View Vendor Documentation

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of Ping Technology Labs LTD's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Data Not Yet Assessed

We haven't collected operational maturity data for Ping Technology Labs LTD yet.

🤖

Security Automation APIs

Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Ping Technology Labs LTD

Ping's SSO capabilities serve as a global authentication authority that allows any user to securely access all the applications they need from any device.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

SAML (Security Assertion Markup Language) is an open authentication standard that makes single sign-on (SSO) to web applications possible. SSO allows users to sign on to multiple web-based application

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Meet PingFederate It serves as a global authentication authority that allows customers, employees, and partners to securely access all the applications they need from any device.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

PingFederate would act as your identity provider (authentication policies) you would use PingOne to manage the PingID service. The integration between PingFederate and PingID would be the PingID. Ping

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Compare with Alternatives

How does Ping Technology Labs LTD stack up against similar applications in Security & Compliance? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application	Overall ScoreScore↓	Grade	AI Security 🤖AI 🤖⇅	Pricing	Action
A-LIGN	34/100🏆	D	N/A	Contact Sales	View ProfileView
Aft India	28/100	F	N/A	Contact Sales	View ProfileView
Adeya SA.	27/100	F	N/A	Contact Sales	View ProfileView
1Password	26/100	F	N/A	Contact Sales	View ProfileView
Ping Technology Labs LTDCurrent	25/100	F	N/A	Contact Sales
ACTi	24/100	F	N/A	Contact Sales	View ProfileView
ACID	23/100	F	N/A	Contact Sales	View ProfileView

💡

Security Comparison Insight

12 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.

View All Apps in Security & Compliance