osapiens Security Assessment

osapiens has a security score of 30/100, placing it in the D grade category, which indicates significant security vulnerabilities across multiple dimensions. The platform's weakest areas include Compliance & Certification (10/100) and Identity & Access Management (25/100), suggesting critical gaps in security governance and user authentication controls. While Infrastructure Security scores 50/100 and provides moderate protection, the overall security posture requires substantial improvement. API Security registers at 30/100, presenting potential integration risks for organizations considering the platform. Encouragingly, Vulnerability Management shows resilience with an 85/100 score, and there are no recorded historical breaches. Security decision-makers should carefully evaluate osapiens's security practices, particularly around access management and compliance standards. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of each security domain and detailed recommendations for mitigating potential risks.

Osapiens receives a security grade of D with an overall score of 30/100, indicating significant security improvement opportunities. The platform demonstrates notable variability across security dimensions. Its strongest areas include Vulnerability Management (scoring 85/100) and a perfect Breach History score, suggesting minimal past security incidents. However, critical security dimensions reveal substantial weaknesses. Identity & Access Management scores only 25/100, while Compliance & Certification lags at a mere 10/100, signaling urgent security governance challenges. API Security and Infrastructure Security hover around 30-50/100, further highlighting systemic security gaps. Incident Response performs moderately at 60/100, with Data Protection scoring 45/100. These scores underscore the need for comprehensive security enhancement across multiple dimensions. Security professionals evaluating Osapiens should prioritize strengthening identity controls, compliance frameworks, and API protection strategies. See Security Dimensions section for detailed performance metrics and recommended mitigation approaches.

Osapiens demonstrates significant security challenges for financial data management, with a low overall security score of 30/100 and a D grade. The platform's weakest dimensions are Compliance & Certification (10/100) and Identity & Access Management (25/100), indicating substantial vulnerabilities in protecting sensitive financial information. While Infrastructure Security scores 50/100 and Data Protection reaches 45/100, these ratings still signal considerable risk for financial transactions. The platform's strongest areas are Vulnerability Management (85/100) and a clean Breach History (100/100), suggesting robust technical safeguards against potential attacks. Financial decision-makers should exercise extreme caution when considering Osapiens for handling sensitive monetary data. Comprehensive risk mitigation strategies and thorough vendor security assessments are critical before deployment. See the Security Dimensions section for a detailed security breakdown and specific vulnerability assessments to inform your risk evaluation.

With a security score of 30/100, osapiens presents significant enterprise risk that requires careful evaluation before approval. The platform's D-grade security rating indicates substantial compliance and security vulnerabilities, including critical gaps in key enterprise certifications like SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS. Security decision-makers should consider these substantial risks before integrating osapiens into their technology ecosystem. The multiple missing compliance standards suggest potential data protection and regulatory challenges that could expose organizations to operational and legal risks. While specific security dimension details require further investigation, the low overall score signals a need for extensive security assessment and potential remediation. Organizations prioritizing robust risk management should conduct a comprehensive security review, potentially requesting detailed security documentation directly from osapiens to validate their security posture. See Security Dimensions section for full comprehensive risk analysis.