Skip to main content
INE logo

INE Security Assessment

Security & Compliance

Pentester Academy is an online platform dedicated to advancing the careers of cybersecurity professionals through comprehensive, hands-on training. Founded in 2011 by renowned security researcher Vivek Ramachandran, the academy offers a vast digital library encompassing over 200 hours of in-depth instructional videos and more than 2,200 interactive labs. These resources cover a wide array of topics, including network penetration testing, web application security, exploit development, and more, catering to learners at various skill levels. Key Features and Functionality: - Extensive Course Offerings: Access to a diverse range of courses such as Python for Pentesters, x86/64 Assembly Language and Shellcoding on Linux, PowerShell for Pentesters, Windows Forensics, and Linux Forensics. - Hands-On Labs: Engage with over 2,200 practical labs that simulate real-world scenarios, allowing learners to apply theoretical knowledge in a controlled environment. - On-Demand Bootcamps: Participate in bootcamps covering topics like web application security, DevSecOps, and cloud security, with recordings available for flexible, self-paced learning. - Experienced Instructors: Learn from industry experts and seasoned professionals who bring real-world insights and expertise to the training programs. - Browser-Based Platform: Utilize a user-friendly, browser-based interface that requires no VPN, facilitating seamless access to courses and labs. Primary Value and Problem Solved: Pentester Academy addresses the growing demand for skilled cybersecurity professionals by providing accessible, high-quality training that bridges the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application. Its hands-on approach ensures that learners are well-equipped to tackle real-world security challenges, enhancing their proficiency and employability in the cybersecurity domain.

Data: 7/8(88%)
SECURITY VERIFIED • SAASPOSTURE • JAN 2026
F
Bottom 20%
INE logoINE
SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .
29
Overall Score
Weighted average across all dimensions
F
Security Grade
Critical
65% confidence

Identity & Access Management

F
Score:0
Weight:33%
Grade:F (Critical)

Compliance & Certification

F
Score:0
Weight:19%
Grade:F (Critical)

AI Integration Security

NEW
N/A
Score:0
Weight:12%
Grade:N/A

API Security

D
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

Infrastructure Security

B
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:B (Top 25%)

Data Protection

F
Score:0
Weight:10%
Grade:F (Critical)

Vulnerability Management

A+
Score:0
Weight:3%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Breach History

A+
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

A
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A (Top 10%)
🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 06:05 PM

Assessment Transparency

See exactly what data backs this security assessment

Data Coverage

7/8 security categories assessed

88%
complete
Identity & Access
Available
Compliance
Available
API Security
Available
Infrastructure
Available
Data Protection
Available
Vulnerability Mgmt
Available
Incident Response
Available
Breach History
Missing

Score based on 7 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.

Evaluation Friction

UNKNOWN
Estimated: Unknown
0% public documentation accessibility

Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.

31 data sources successful

Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility

Comprehensive Security Analysis

In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations

Security Analysis

Executive Summary

MetricValueAssessment
Security GradeFNeeds Improvement
Risk LevelHighNot recommended
Enterprise Readiness42%Gaps Exist
Critical Gaps0None

Security Assessment

CategoryScoreStatusAction Required
🟢 Breach History100/100excellentMaintain current controls
🟡 Vulnerability Management85/100goodMaintain current controls
🟠 Incident Response60/100needs_improvementMonitor and improve gradually
🟠 Infrastructure Security50/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 API Security30/100needs_improvementAdd rate limiting and authentication
🟠 Identity & Access Management25/100needs_improvementURGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately
🟠 Compliance & Certification20/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 Data Protection20/100needs_improvementImplement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more

Overall Grade: F (29/100)

Critical Security Gaps

GapSeverityBusiness ImpactRecommendation
🟢 No dedicated security documentation pageLOWExtended due diligence processRequest security whitepaper or public audit reports

Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0

Compliance Status

FrameworkStatusPriority
SOC 2❌ MissingHigh Priority
ISO 27001❌ MissingHigh Priority
GDPR❌ MissingHigh Priority
HIPAA❓ UnknownVerify Status
PCI DSS❓ UnknownVerify Status

Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.

Operational Excellence

MetricStatusDetails
Status Page✅ Availablehttps://status.ine.com
Documentation Quality❌ 0/10No SDKs
SLA Commitment❌ NoneNo public SLA
API Versioning⚠️ NoneNo version control
Support Channelsℹ️ 1 channelsEmail

Operational Facts Extracted: 5 data points from operational_maturity enrichment

Integration Requirements

AspectDetailsNotes
Setup Time3-5 days (manual setup required)Estimated deployment timeline
Known IssuesManual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls neededImplementation considerations

⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration

Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:

Risk Level: LOW - Contains

Compliance & Certifications

0
Active
0
Pending
6
Not Certified

API Intelligence

Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for INE.

API Intelligence

Incomplete

API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.

Incomplete API Intelligence

Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.

View Vendor Documentation

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of INE's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Maturity

Support, SLAs, and documentation quality

Support Channels

📧
Email Support
🤖

Security Automation APIs

Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about INE

Authentication: process of an entity (the Principal) proving its identity to another entity (the System). Single Sign On (SSO): characteristic of an authentication mechanism that relates to the user's

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Single sign-on (SSO) authentication allows users to securely access multiple related applications or systems using just one set of credentials.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

SSO is secure but is a single point of failure; if the IdP account is compromised, many others may also be. MFA adds a step beyond inputting a password but is still relatively seamless.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Compare with Alternatives

How does INE stack up against similar applications in Security & Compliance? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application
Score
Grade
AI 🤖
Action
34🏆
DN/AView
INECurrent
29
FN/A
28
FN/AView
27
FN/AView
26
FN/AView
24
FN/AView
23
FN/AView
💡

Security Comparison Insight

7 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.