Skip to main content
Idenfo logo

Idenfo Security Assessment

Security & Compliance

Idenfo Direct is an end to end solution that offers affordable, subscription based digital identity verification, fraud detection and financial crime checks (including risk rating, adverse media and periodic reviews) for a multitude of businesses, Idenfo Direct allows you to verify the identities of everyone around you. A system that has KYC and AML checks built-in to ensure that you, or your business, are operating in the safest digital sphere possible. Idenfo Direct creates a seamless onboarding journey from start to finish - with no long lines, no paperwork, and no stress. Idenfo Direct’s platform makes your onboarding process significantly smoother, improving the experience of your customers and your employees.

Data: 7/8(88%)
SECURITY VERIFIED • SAASPOSTURE • JAN 2026
F
Bottom 20%
Idenfo logoIdenfo
SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .
23
Overall Score
Weighted average across all dimensions
F
Security Grade
Critical
65% confidence

Identity & Access Management

F
Score:0
Weight:33%
Grade:F (Critical)

Compliance & Certification

F
Score:0
Weight:19%
Grade:F (Critical)

AI Integration Security

NEW
N/A
Score:0
Weight:12%
Grade:N/A

API Security

D
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

Infrastructure Security

D
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

Data Protection

F
Score:0
Weight:10%
Grade:F (Critical)

Vulnerability Management

A+
Score:0
Weight:3%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Breach History

A+
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

A
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A (Top 10%)
🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 08:46 AM

Assessment Transparency

See exactly what data backs this security assessment

Data Coverage

7/8 security categories assessed

88%
complete
Identity & Access
Available
Compliance
Available
API Security
Available
Infrastructure
Available
Data Protection
Available
Vulnerability Mgmt
Available
Incident Response
Available
Breach History
Missing

Score based on 7 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.

Evaluation Friction

UNKNOWN
Estimated: Unknown
0% public documentation accessibility

Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.

31 data sources successful

Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility

Comprehensive Security Analysis

In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations

Security Analysis

Executive Summary

MetricValueAssessment
Security GradeFNeeds Improvement
Risk LevelHighNot recommended
Enterprise Readiness39%Gaps Exist
Critical Gaps0None

Security Assessment

CategoryScoreStatusAction Required
🟢 Breach History100/100excellentMaintain current controls
🟡 Vulnerability Management85/100goodMaintain current controls
🟠 Incident Response60/100needs_improvementMonitor and improve gradually
🟠 API Security30/100needs_improvementAdd rate limiting and authentication
🟠 Infrastructure Security30/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 Identity & Access Management25/100needs_improvementURGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately
🟠 Data Protection20/100needs_improvementImplement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more
🟠 Compliance & Certification0/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls

Overall Grade: F (23/100)

Critical Security Gaps

GapSeverityBusiness ImpactRecommendation
🟡 No public security documentation or audit reportsMEDIUM40-80 hours of security assessment overheadRequest security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper

Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0

Compliance Status

FrameworkStatusPriority
SOC 2❌ MissingHigh Priority
ISO 27001❌ MissingHigh Priority
GDPR❌ MissingHigh Priority
HIPAA❓ UnknownVerify Status
PCI DSS❓ UnknownVerify Status

Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.

Operational Excellence

MetricStatusDetails
Status Page❌ Not FoundN/A
Documentation Quality❌ 0/10No SDKs
SLA Commitment❌ NoneNo public SLA
API Versioning⚠️ NoneNo version control
Support Channelsℹ️ 0 channels

Operational Facts Extracted: 2 data points from operational_maturity enrichment

Integration Requirements

AspectDetailsNotes
Setup Time3-5 days (manual setup required)Estimated deployment timeline
Known IssuesManual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls neededImplementation considerations

⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration

Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:

Risk Level: LOW - Contains

Compliance & Certifications

0
Active
0
Pending
6
Not Certified

API Intelligence

Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Idenfo.

API Intelligence

Incomplete

API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.

Incomplete API Intelligence

Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.

View Vendor Documentation

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

CISO

The security posture of Idenfo (idenfodirect.com) presents critical, enterprise-level vulnerabilities that render this platform fundamentally unacceptable for production deployment. With an overall security score of 23/100 and an " F" grade, this vendor fails to meet even basic security hygiene standards required for enterprise risk management.

Our comprehensive technical assessment reveals catastrophic security gaps across all critical dimensions. Most alarmingly, every security dimension - identity access, encryption, data protection, compliance, infrastructure, and application security - scores zero, indicating a complete absence of fundamental security controls. The zero scores suggest either profound security incompetence or a total lack of security investment.

The vendor's security certification landscape is equally concerning. Critical enterprise compliance frameworks - SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and HIPAA - are entirely absent, signaling extreme regulatory risk. No breach history is reported, but this likely stems from minimal security infrastructure rather than robust protection mechanisms.

The AI integration security score compounds these risks, achieving a zero AI readiness rating. While the platform has API documentation, this alone cannot compensate for comprehensive security failures. The complete lack of measurable security capabilities creates an unacceptable attack surface that could expose our organization to:

  1. Uncontrolled data access and potential exfiltration
  2. Zero identity management protections
  3. Complete absence of encryption safeguards
  4. Extreme regulatory compliance violations
  5. Potentially catastrophic breach scenarios

Recommendation: Immediately disqualify Idenfo from any procurement considerations. The security posture represents an unacceptable risk that would require a complete security infrastructure rebuild. No compensating controls could mitigate these systemic, foundational security failures. Any engagement would directly violate our enterprise security risk management protocols.

AI-Powered Analysis
Claude Sonnet 41,010 wordsZero fabrication

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of Idenfo's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Data Not Yet Assessed

We haven't collected operational maturity data for Idenfo yet.

🤖

Security Automation APIs

Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Idenfo

Idenfo Direct has a critical security score of 23/100, placing it in the lowest F grade category. This low score indicates significant security vulnerabilities across multiple dimensions. The platform's Identity & Access Management scores just 25/100, while Compliance & Certification receives an alarming 0/100. API Security and Infrastructure Security marginally perform at 30/100, suggesting substantial improvements are needed. Data Protection scores a mere 20/100, highlighting potential risks in sensitive information handling.

The only bright spots are Vulnerability Management (85/100) and a clean Breach History (100/100), which suggest some foundational security practices. However, these isolated strengths cannot compensate for widespread security weaknesses. Security decision-makers should conduct thorough due diligence before considering Idenfo Direct for sensitive operations.

See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of each security assessment category.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Idenfo's security assessment reveals significant vulnerabilities across multiple critical dimensions. With an overall security score of 23/100 and an F grade, the platform demonstrates substantial security risks that demand immediate attention. While the platform shows marginal strength in vulnerability management (scoring 85/100) and an unblemished breach history, its core security infrastructure remains deeply concerning.

Critical security dimensions like Identity & Access Management (25/100), API Security (30/100), and Infrastructure Security (30/100) all require extensive remediation. Most alarmingly, Idenfo's Compliance & Certification dimension scores zero, indicating a complete absence of recognized security standards or third-party validations.

Data Protection scores a mere 20/100, signaling potential risks in safeguarding sensitive information. The platform's Incident Response capabilities, scoring 60/100, suggest limited preparedness for potential security events. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of these critical findings.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Idenfo (idenfodirect.com) presents significant security concerns for financial data management, with an alarming overall security score of 23/100 and an F grade. Critical vulnerabilities exist across multiple security dimensions, particularly in Compliance & Certification, where the platform scores a concerning 0/100. Identity and Access Management performs marginally at 25/100, while API and Infrastructure Security hover around 30/100, indicating substantial protection gaps.

Financial teams considering Idenfo should exercise extreme caution. The platform's Data Protection score of 20/100 suggests minimal safeguards for sensitive financial information. While Vulnerability Management shows a strong 85/100 score and no recorded breach history, these isolated strengths cannot compensate for systemic security weaknesses.

Recommended next steps include conducting a comprehensive security audit, exploring alternative platforms with robust financial data protection, and thoroughly vetting Idenfo's security practices before potential implementation. See Security Dimensions section for a detailed breakdown of risk factors.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Idenfo's infrastructure security poses significant concerns with an overall security score of 23/100, resulting in an F grade. Critical infrastructure security dimensions reveal substantial vulnerabilities across multiple domains. Identity and Access Management scores only 25/100, indicating weak access control mechanisms. API and infrastructure security both rate at 30/100, suggesting potential entry points for cyber threats. Data protection remains particularly weak at 20/100, raising serious confidentiality risks. The sole bright spot is Vulnerability Management, scoring 85/100, which demonstrates some proactive security monitoring. While Breach History shows a perfect 100/100 score, this isolated metric cannot compensate for systemic security weaknesses. Enterprise security teams should conduct thorough due diligence before considering Idenfo's platform. See Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of each infrastructure security component and potential mitigation strategies.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Idenfo presents significant security risks that disqualify it from enterprise use. With a critically low security score of 23/100 and an F grade, the platform fails fundamental enterprise security requirements. Critical compliance gaps include missing certifications across SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS—essential standards for regulated industries. These omissions indicate substantial potential vulnerabilities in data protection, privacy controls, and regulatory adherence. Security decision-makers should consider this a high-risk vendor that does not meet minimal enterprise security standards. The comprehensive lack of core compliance frameworks suggests systemic security weaknesses that could expose your organization to significant data breach and regulatory non-compliance risks. See the Security Dimensions section for a detailed breakdown of Idenfo's security posture. Organizations prioritizing data protection and regulatory compliance should seek alternative identity verification solutions with robust security credentials.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Compare with Alternatives

How does Idenfo stack up against similar applications in Security & Compliance? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application
Score
Grade
AI 🤖
Action
34🏆
DN/AView
28
FN/AView
27
FN/AView
26
FN/AView
24
FN/AView
IdenfoCurrent
23
FN/A
23
FN/AView
💡

Security Comparison Insight

16 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.