Hook Security Security Assessment
Security & Compliance
With Hook Security, you can run a fully automated security awareness training program that creates a positive and healthy security culture for your company, mitigating risk while entertaining employees. Run automated phishing testing, enroll your users in effective security awareness training courses, and generate reports that actually tell you how you're doing. Come see why PsySec is the best way to train your employees
9-Dimension Security Framework
Identity & Access Management
Compliance & Certification
AI Integration Security
NEWAPI Security
Infrastructure Security
Data Protection
Vulnerability Management
Breach History
Incident Response
AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)
Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.
Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 08:46 AM
Assessment Transparency
See exactly what data backs this security assessment
Data Coverage
7/8 security categories assessed
Score based on 7 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.
Evaluation Friction
Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.
Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility
Comprehensive Security Analysis
In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations
Security Analysis
Executive Summary
| Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Security Grade | F | Needs Improvement |
| Risk Level | High | Not recommended |
| Enterprise Readiness | 40% | Gaps Exist |
| Critical Gaps | 0 | None |
Security Assessment
| Category | Score | Status | Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟢 Breach History | 100/100 | excellent | Maintain current controls |
| 🟡 Vulnerability Management | 85/100 | good | Maintain current controls |
| 🟠 Incident Response | 60/100 | needs_improvement | Monitor and improve gradually |
| 🟠 Data Protection | 45/100 | needs_improvement | Implement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more |
| 🟠 API Security | 30/100 | needs_improvement | Add rate limiting and authentication |
| 🟠 Identity & Access Management | 25/100 | needs_improvement | URGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately |
| 🟠 Infrastructure Security | 20/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
| 🟠 Compliance & Certification | 0/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
Overall Grade: F (24/100)
Critical Security Gaps
| Gap | Severity | Business Impact | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟡 No public security documentation or audit reports | MEDIUM | 40-80 hours of security assessment overhead | Request security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper |
Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0
Compliance Status
| Framework | Status | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| ISO 27001 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| GDPR | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| HIPAA | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
| PCI DSS | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.
Operational Excellence
| Metric | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Status Page | ❌ Not Found | N/A |
| Documentation Quality | ❌ 0/10 | No SDKs |
| SLA Commitment | ❌ None | No public SLA |
| API Versioning | ⚠️ None | No version control |
| Support Channels | ℹ️ 0 channels |
Operational Facts Extracted: 2 data points from operational_maturity enrichment
Integration Requirements
| Aspect | Details | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Time | 3-5 days (manual setup required) | Estimated deployment timeline |
| Known Issues | Manual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls needed | Implementation considerations |
⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration
Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:
Risk Level: LOW - Contains
Compliance & Certifications
API Intelligence
Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Hook Security.
API Intelligence
API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.
Incomplete API Intelligence
Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.
View Vendor DocumentationAI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis
LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.
CISO
As the Chief Information Security Officer for a 5,000-employee enterprise, I find Hook Security's current security posture presents moderate risks that require careful evaluation and targeted remediation.
With an overall security score of 41, falling into the C grade category, Hook Security demonstrates mixed security maturity that raises several critical concerns. Most alarmingly, the platform shows zero scoring across all critical security dimensions - including identity access, encryption, compliance, infrastructure, and application security. This comprehensive zero-scoring suggests either significant data collection challenges or fundamental security framework gaps.
The absence of key enterprise-grade security certifications compounds these concerns. No SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, or HIPAA compliance validates the platform's security controls. The lack of documented breach history provides minimal reassurance, as it could indicate insufficient incident reporting rather than true security resilience.
The AI integration security score compounds our risk assessment, with a complete zero rating for AI readiness. Despite having API documentation, the platform demonstrates no measurable capability to secure AI interactions or protect against emerging AI-driven security threats. This represents a critical blind spot for modern enterprise technology environments.
Recommendation: Conditional approval with mandatory security enhancement requirements. Before production deployment, Hook Security must:
- Complete comprehensive third-party security assessment
- Obtain at least one enterprise-grade security certification
- Develop and demonstrate robust identity and data protection controls
- Implement documented AI security integration framework
The current security profile requires significant remediation before enterprise adoption can be responsibly considered. Extensive due diligence and vendor engagement are essential to mitigate potential organizational risk.
Security Posture & Operational Capabilities
Comprehensive assessment of Hook Security's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.
Operational Data Not Yet Assessed
We haven't collected operational maturity data for Hook Security yet.
Security Automation APIs
Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Hook Security
Hook Security receives an overall security score of 24/100, resulting in an F grade that signals significant security improvement opportunities. The company demonstrates notable weakness across multiple critical security dimensions, with Identity & Access Management scoring just 25/100 and Compliance & Certification measuring 0/100. The only standout areas are Vulnerability Management (85/100) and Breach History (perfect 100/100 score), which provide minimal positive signals in an otherwise concerning security profile.
The security assessment reveals systemic challenges in API Security (30/100), Infrastructure Security (20/100), and Data Protection (45/100). While the Incident Response capability sits at a moderate 60/100, the cumulative security posture suggests substantial risk. Security decision-makers should carefully evaluate these metrics and consider comprehensive security remediation strategies.
See Security Dimensions section for a detailed security breakdown and specific improvement recommendations.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Hook Security presents significant security concerns for financial data management. With an overall security score of 24/100 and an F grade, the platform demonstrates substantial vulnerabilities across critical security dimensions. The Identity and Access Management score of 25/100 indicates weak authentication controls, while the Compliance and Certification score of 0 suggests a complete absence of industry-standard security certifications. API security (30/100) and infrastructure security (20/100) further underscore potential risks for financial data protection.
The only bright spots are Vulnerability Management (85/100) and a clean Breach History (100/100), which marginally mitigate overall security weaknesses. Data Protection scores 45/100, revealing potential gaps in sensitive information handling. Financial organizations and security professionals should exercise extreme caution and conduct thorough additional due diligence before considering Hook Security for managing sensitive financial data. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive security breakdown.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Hook Security's low security score of 24/100 and F grade indicate significant enterprise risk, making it challenging to recommend for organizational deployment. Critical compliance gaps across SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS standards reveal substantial security infrastructure weaknesses. Security decision-makers should exercise extreme caution, conducting thorough due diligence before considering this platform. The multiple missing compliance certifications suggest potential vulnerabilities that could expose sensitive organizational data to potential breaches. While individual security requirements vary, this vendor demonstrates considerable gaps in meeting standard enterprise security benchmarks. Comprehensive risk assessment is mandatory, potentially requiring direct engagement with Hook Security to understand their security roadmap and mitigation strategies. Organizations prioritizing robust security controls should carefully evaluate alternative solutions with stronger compliance frameworks and higher security scores. Detailed risk analysis is available in the Security Dimensions section of our comprehensive assessment.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Compare with Alternatives
How does Hook Security stack up against similar applications in Security & Compliance? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.
| Application | Overall ScoreScore↓ | Grade | AI Security 🤖AI 🤖⇅ | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
34/100🏆 | D | N/A | View ProfileView | |
28/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
27/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
26/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
Hook SecurityCurrent | 24/100 | F | N/A | |
24/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
23/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView |
Security Comparison Insight
13 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.