Skip to main content
Hook Security logo

Hook Security Security Assessment

Security & Compliance

With Hook Security, you can run a fully automated security awareness training program that creates a positive and healthy security culture for your company, mitigating risk while entertaining employees. Run automated phishing testing, enroll your users in effective security awareness training courses, and generate reports that actually tell you how you're doing. Come see why PsySec is the best way to train your employees

Data: 7/8(88%)
SECURITY VERIFIED • SAASPOSTURE • JAN 2026
F
Bottom 20%
Hook Security logoHook Security
SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .
24
Overall Score
Weighted average across all dimensions
F
Security Grade
Critical
65% confidence

Identity & Access Management

F
Score:0
Weight:33%
Grade:F (Critical)

Compliance & Certification

F
Score:0
Weight:19%
Grade:F (Critical)

AI Integration Security

NEW
N/A
Score:0
Weight:12%
Grade:N/A

API Security

D
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

Infrastructure Security

F
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:F (Critical)

Data Protection

C+
Score:0
Weight:10%
Grade:C+ (Top 50%)

Vulnerability Management

A+
Score:0
Weight:3%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Breach History

A+
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

A
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A (Top 10%)
🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 08:46 AM

Assessment Transparency

See exactly what data backs this security assessment

Data Coverage

7/8 security categories assessed

88%
complete
Identity & Access
Available
Compliance
Available
API Security
Available
Infrastructure
Available
Data Protection
Available
Vulnerability Mgmt
Available
Incident Response
Available
Breach History
Missing

Score based on 7 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.

Evaluation Friction

UNKNOWN
Estimated: Unknown
0% public documentation accessibility

Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.

32 data sources successful

Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility

Comprehensive Security Analysis

In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations

Security Analysis

Executive Summary

MetricValueAssessment
Security GradeFNeeds Improvement
Risk LevelHighNot recommended
Enterprise Readiness40%Gaps Exist
Critical Gaps0None

Security Assessment

CategoryScoreStatusAction Required
🟢 Breach History100/100excellentMaintain current controls
🟡 Vulnerability Management85/100goodMaintain current controls
🟠 Incident Response60/100needs_improvementMonitor and improve gradually
🟠 Data Protection45/100needs_improvementImplement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more
🟠 API Security30/100needs_improvementAdd rate limiting and authentication
🟠 Identity & Access Management25/100needs_improvementURGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately
🟠 Infrastructure Security20/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 Compliance & Certification0/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls

Overall Grade: F (24/100)

Critical Security Gaps

GapSeverityBusiness ImpactRecommendation
🟡 No public security documentation or audit reportsMEDIUM40-80 hours of security assessment overheadRequest security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper

Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0

Compliance Status

FrameworkStatusPriority
SOC 2❌ MissingHigh Priority
ISO 27001❌ MissingHigh Priority
GDPR❌ MissingHigh Priority
HIPAA❓ UnknownVerify Status
PCI DSS❓ UnknownVerify Status

Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.

Operational Excellence

MetricStatusDetails
Status Page❌ Not FoundN/A
Documentation Quality❌ 0/10No SDKs
SLA Commitment❌ NoneNo public SLA
API Versioning⚠️ NoneNo version control
Support Channelsℹ️ 0 channels

Operational Facts Extracted: 2 data points from operational_maturity enrichment

Integration Requirements

AspectDetailsNotes
Setup Time3-5 days (manual setup required)Estimated deployment timeline
Known IssuesManual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls neededImplementation considerations

⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration

Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:

Risk Level: LOW - Contains

Compliance & Certifications

0
Active
0
Pending
6
Not Certified

API Intelligence

Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Hook Security.

API Intelligence

Incomplete

API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.

Incomplete API Intelligence

Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.

View Vendor Documentation

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

CISO

As the Chief Information Security Officer for a 5,000-employee enterprise, I find Hook Security's current security posture presents moderate risks that require careful evaluation and targeted remediation.

With an overall security score of 41, falling into the C grade category, Hook Security demonstrates mixed security maturity that raises several critical concerns. Most alarmingly, the platform shows zero scoring across all critical security dimensions - including identity access, encryption, compliance, infrastructure, and application security. This comprehensive zero-scoring suggests either significant data collection challenges or fundamental security framework gaps.

The absence of key enterprise-grade security certifications compounds these concerns. No SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, or HIPAA compliance validates the platform's security controls. The lack of documented breach history provides minimal reassurance, as it could indicate insufficient incident reporting rather than true security resilience.

The AI integration security score compounds our risk assessment, with a complete zero rating for AI readiness. Despite having API documentation, the platform demonstrates no measurable capability to secure AI interactions or protect against emerging AI-driven security threats. This represents a critical blind spot for modern enterprise technology environments.

Recommendation: Conditional approval with mandatory security enhancement requirements. Before production deployment, Hook Security must:

  1. Complete comprehensive third-party security assessment
  2. Obtain at least one enterprise-grade security certification
  3. Develop and demonstrate robust identity and data protection controls
  4. Implement documented AI security integration framework

The current security profile requires significant remediation before enterprise adoption can be responsibly considered. Extensive due diligence and vendor engagement are essential to mitigate potential organizational risk.

AI-Powered Analysis
Claude Sonnet 4976 wordsZero fabrication

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of Hook Security's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Data Not Yet Assessed

We haven't collected operational maturity data for Hook Security yet.

🤖

Security Automation APIs

Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Hook Security

Hook Security receives an overall security score of 24/100, resulting in an F grade that signals significant security improvement opportunities. The company demonstrates notable weakness across multiple critical security dimensions, with Identity & Access Management scoring just 25/100 and Compliance & Certification measuring 0/100. The only standout areas are Vulnerability Management (85/100) and Breach History (perfect 100/100 score), which provide minimal positive signals in an otherwise concerning security profile.

The security assessment reveals systemic challenges in API Security (30/100), Infrastructure Security (20/100), and Data Protection (45/100). While the Incident Response capability sits at a moderate 60/100, the cumulative security posture suggests substantial risk. Security decision-makers should carefully evaluate these metrics and consider comprehensive security remediation strategies.

See Security Dimensions section for a detailed security breakdown and specific improvement recommendations.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Hook Security presents significant security concerns for financial data management. With an overall security score of 24/100 and an F grade, the platform demonstrates substantial vulnerabilities across critical security dimensions. The Identity and Access Management score of 25/100 indicates weak authentication controls, while the Compliance and Certification score of 0 suggests a complete absence of industry-standard security certifications. API security (30/100) and infrastructure security (20/100) further underscore potential risks for financial data protection.

The only bright spots are Vulnerability Management (85/100) and a clean Breach History (100/100), which marginally mitigate overall security weaknesses. Data Protection scores 45/100, revealing potential gaps in sensitive information handling. Financial organizations and security professionals should exercise extreme caution and conduct thorough additional due diligence before considering Hook Security for managing sensitive financial data. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive security breakdown.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Hook Security's low security score of 24/100 and F grade indicate significant enterprise risk, making it challenging to recommend for organizational deployment. Critical compliance gaps across SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS standards reveal substantial security infrastructure weaknesses. Security decision-makers should exercise extreme caution, conducting thorough due diligence before considering this platform. The multiple missing compliance certifications suggest potential vulnerabilities that could expose sensitive organizational data to potential breaches. While individual security requirements vary, this vendor demonstrates considerable gaps in meeting standard enterprise security benchmarks. Comprehensive risk assessment is mandatory, potentially requiring direct engagement with Hook Security to understand their security roadmap and mitigation strategies. Organizations prioritizing robust security controls should carefully evaluate alternative solutions with stronger compliance frameworks and higher security scores. Detailed risk analysis is available in the Security Dimensions section of our comprehensive assessment.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Compare with Alternatives

How does Hook Security stack up against similar applications in Security & Compliance? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application
Score
Grade
AI 🤖
Action
34🏆
DN/AView
28
FN/AView
27
FN/AView
26
FN/AView
24
FN/A
24
FN/AView
23
FN/AView
💡

Security Comparison Insight

13 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.