Skip to main content
WebPros logo

WebPros Security Assessment

IT & Infrastructure

Globally empowering hosting providers through fully automated point-and-click hosting platforms by hosting centric professionals

Data: 7/8(88%)
SECURITY VERIFIED • SAASPOSTURE • JAN 2026
F
Bottom 20%
WebPros logoWebPros
SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .
27
Overall Score
Weighted average across all dimensions
F
Security Grade
Critical
65% confidence

Identity & Access Management

F
Score:0
Weight:33%
Grade:F (Critical)

Compliance & Certification

F
Score:0
Weight:19%
Grade:F (Critical)

AI Integration Security

NEW
N/A
Score:0
Weight:12%
Grade:N/A

API Security

D
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

Infrastructure Security

B
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:B (Top 25%)

Data Protection

D
Score:0
Weight:10%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

Vulnerability Management

A+
Score:0
Weight:3%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Breach History

A+
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

A
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A (Top 10%)
🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 08:46 AM

Assessment Transparency

See exactly what data backs this security assessment

Data Coverage

7/8 security categories assessed

88%
complete
Identity & Access
Available
Compliance
Available
API Security
Available
Infrastructure
Available
Data Protection
Available
Vulnerability Mgmt
Available
Incident Response
Available
Breach History
Missing

Score based on 7 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.

Evaluation Friction

UNKNOWN
Estimated: Unknown
0% public documentation accessibility

Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.

33 data sources successful

Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility

Comprehensive Security Analysis

In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations

Security Analysis

Executive Summary

MetricValueAssessment
Security GradeFNeeds Improvement
Risk LevelHighNot recommended
Enterprise Readiness41%Gaps Exist
Critical Gaps0None

Security Assessment

CategoryScoreStatusAction Required
🟢 Breach History100/100excellentMaintain current controls
🟡 Vulnerability Management85/100goodMaintain current controls
🟠 Incident Response60/100needs_improvementMonitor and improve gradually
🟠 Infrastructure Security50/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 API Security30/100needs_improvementAdd rate limiting and authentication
🟠 Data Protection30/100needs_improvementImplement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more
🟠 Identity & Access Management25/100needs_improvementURGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately
🟠 Compliance & Certification0/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls

Overall Grade: F (27/100)

Critical Security Gaps

GapSeverityBusiness ImpactRecommendation
🟡 No public security documentation or audit reportsMEDIUM40-80 hours of security assessment overheadRequest security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper

Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0

Compliance Status

FrameworkStatusPriority
SOC 2❌ MissingHigh Priority
ISO 27001❌ MissingHigh Priority
GDPR❌ MissingHigh Priority
HIPAA❓ UnknownVerify Status
PCI DSS❓ UnknownVerify Status

Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.

Operational Excellence

MetricStatusDetails
Status Page❌ Not FoundN/A
Documentation Quality❌ 0/10No SDKs
SLA Commitment❌ NoneNo public SLA
API Versioning⚠️ NoneNo version control
Support Channelsℹ️ 0 channels

Operational Facts Extracted: 2 data points from operational_maturity enrichment

Integration Requirements

AspectDetailsNotes
Setup Time3-5 days (manual setup required)Estimated deployment timeline
Known IssuesManual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls neededImplementation considerations

Authentication Capabilities

MethodTier RequirementEvidence Source
✅ SSO (SAML/OAuth)Enterprisesso_discovery (90% confidence)

Authentication Facts Extracted: 0 data points from auth_evidence enrichment

⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration

Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:

Risk Level: LOW - Contains

Compliance & Certifications

0
Active
0
Pending
6
Not Certified

API Intelligence

Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for WebPros.

API Intelligence

Incomplete

API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.

Incomplete API Intelligence

Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.

View Vendor Documentation

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

CISO

WebPros presents an unacceptable security posture that exposes our enterprise to critical vulnerabilities and substantial risk. The platform's dismal 28/100 overall security score represents a comprehensive failure across fundamental security capabilities.

Our comprehensive risk assessment reveals catastrophic security deficiencies across every assessed dimension. Zero scores in critical domains like identity access, encryption, compliance, and infrastructure security indicate a systemic security breakdown. The absence of foundational security certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR compliance) further amplifies our grave concerns.

The AI integration security score of 15/100 compounds our risk exposure. This ultra-low score suggests zero mature controls for protecting AI-driven interactions, potentially enabling unauthorized data exfiltration, model manipulation, and catastrophic integration vulnerabilities. While the platform possesses API documentation and MCP server availability, these are meaningless without robust security foundations.

CISO Recommendation: IMMEDIATE REJECTION. WebPros is unsuitable for any production environment, especially in an enterprise with 5,000 employees handling sensitive data. The security posture represents an unacceptable risk that would directly threaten our organizational security integrity. No compensating controls can mitigate these fundamental, pervasive security failures. Complete vendor re-evaluation is required before any consideration of deployment.

AI-Powered Analysis
Claude Sonnet 4838 wordsZero fabrication

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of WebPros's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Data Not Yet Assessed

We haven't collected operational maturity data for WebPros yet.

🔐

Authentication Data Not Yet Assessed

We haven't collected authentication and authorization data for WebPros yet.

🤖

Security Automation APIs

Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about WebPros

WebPros has received a low security score of 27/100, earning an F grade in our comprehensive SaaS security assessment. Critical vulnerabilities span multiple security dimensions, with particularly weak performance in Compliance & Certification (0/100) and Identity & Access Management (25/100). The API Security score of 30/100 and Data Protection rating of 30/100 further underscore significant security risks for potential users.

Despite these challenges, WebPros demonstrates strength in Vulnerability Management (85/100) and maintains a clean Breach History (100/100). The Infrastructure Security score of 50/100 suggests moderate baseline protections. However, the overall security posture indicates substantial improvements are required to meet enterprise-grade security standards.

Security decision-makers should conduct thorough due diligence, requesting detailed security documentation directly from WebPros. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of each assessed category.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

WebPros demonstrates significant security challenges with an overall security score of 27/100, resulting in an F grade. Critical security dimensions reveal systematic weaknesses across multiple domains. Identity and Access Management scores a low 25/100, indicating substantial risks in user authentication and authorization processes. Compliance and Certification presents an alarming 0/100, suggesting potential regulatory and standardization gaps. While Vulnerability Management achieves an impressive 85/100, this single bright spot cannot compensate for broader systemic security deficiencies.

API Security (30/100) and Data Protection (30/100) further underscore the platform's security vulnerabilities. Infrastructure Security marginally performs at 50/100, reflecting inadequate protective measures. The Incident Response capability at 60/100 implies limited readiness for potential security events. Organizations considering WebPros should conduct thorough due diligence, as the security assessment reveals critical areas requiring immediate remediation.

Explore the Security Dimensions section for comprehensive analysis of each security parameter.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

WebPros demonstrates significant security vulnerabilities that make it unsuitable for handling sensitive financial data. With an overall security score of 27/100 and an "F" grade, the platform exhibits critical weaknesses across multiple security dimensions. The Identity & Access Management score of 25/100 indicates substantial risk in user authentication and access controls. Moreover, the Compliance & Certification dimension scores zero, suggesting a complete absence of recognized security standards or third-party certifications.

While the Vulnerability Management dimension shows a strong 85/100 score, this isolated strength cannot compensate for systemic security deficiencies. The Data Protection and API Security scores hover around 30/100, presenting significant potential entry points for cyber threats. Financial professionals should exercise extreme caution and avoid transmitting sensitive financial information through WebPros until comprehensive security improvements are implemented.

Detailed security assessment available in the Security Dimensions section of this report.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

WebPros demonstrates significant authentication security challenges, with its Identity & Access Management scoring just 25/100, indicating critical vulnerabilities in login mechanisms. The platform's overall security score of 27/100 earns an F grade, signaling substantial risks for organizations considering its services. While WebPros maintains a strong Vulnerability Management score of 85 and a perfect Breach History rating, its authentication framework appears fundamentally weak.

The limited authentication data suggests minimal multi-factor authentication (MFA) support and potential gaps in login security protocols. Security professionals should conduct thorough due diligence before implementation, carefully evaluating WebPros' access control mechanisms. The platform's low Identity & Access Management score (25/100) raises serious concerns about potential unauthorized access risks.

See Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of WebPros' authentication and security landscape.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

WebPros demonstrates significant security infrastructure challenges, earning a low security score of 27/100 and receiving an "F" grade in our comprehensive security assessment. Critical weaknesses span multiple security dimensions, with Identity & Access Management scoring just 25/100 and Compliance & Certification registering at 0/100. While Vulnerability Management shows a strong 85/100 score and Breach History rates excellent at 100/100, the overall infrastructure security remains at a marginal 50/100.

API Security (30/100) and Data Protection (30/100) further underscore potential vulnerabilities in WebPros's cloud infrastructure. The Incident Response capability sits at a moderate 60/100, indicating limited preparedness for potential security events. Organizations considering WebPros should conduct thorough due diligence, implement additional security controls, and carefully monitor their digital interactions. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of these critical metrics.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

WebPros presents significant security risks for enterprise deployment, with a critical security score of 27/100 and an "F" grade. The platform fails to meet fundamental enterprise security standards, lacking essential compliance certifications including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS.

Organizations considering WebPros should conduct extensive due diligence and implement robust risk mitigation strategies. The low overall security score indicates potential vulnerabilities that could expose sensitive corporate data to unauthorized access or breaches. Multiple compliance gaps suggest the platform may not meet stringent regulatory requirements critical for enterprise-grade applications.

Security decision-makers should thoroughly evaluate WebPros' security infrastructure, request comprehensive security documentation, and consider alternative solutions with stronger security postures. The platform's current security profile makes it challenging to recommend for enterprise use without significant improvements.

See Security Dimensions section for detailed risk assessment and compliance analysis.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Compare with Alternatives

How does WebPros stack up against similar applications in IT & Infrastructure? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application
Score
Grade
AI 🤖
Action
52🏆
BN/AView
44
CN/AView
41
CN/AView
37
D+N/AView
36
D+N/AView
31
DN/AView
WebProsCurrent
27
FN/A
💡

Security Comparison Insight

17 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.