Vonage Security Assessment
Communication & Collaboration
Vonage Communications APIs enable you to transform your customer experiences with programmable video, voice, messaging, and more.
9-Dimension Security Framework
Identity & Access Management
Compliance & Certification
AI Integration Security
NEWAPI Security
Infrastructure Security
Data Protection
Vulnerability Management
Breach History
Incident Response
AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)
Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.
Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 08:46 AM
Assessment Transparency
See exactly what data backs this security assessment
Data Coverage
4/8 security categories assessed
Score based on 4 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.
Evaluation Friction
Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.
Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility
Comprehensive Security Analysis
In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations
Security Analysis
Executive Summary
| Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Security Grade | F | Needs Improvement |
| Risk Level | High | Not recommended |
| Enterprise Readiness | 39% | Gaps Exist |
| Critical Gaps | 0 | None |
Security Assessment
| Category | Score | Status | Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟢 Breach History | 100/100 | excellent | Maintain current controls |
| 🟡 Vulnerability Management | 85/100 | good | Maintain current controls |
| 🟠 API Security | 30/100 | needs_improvement | Add rate limiting and authentication |
| 🟠 Infrastructure Security | 30/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
| 🟠 Identity & Access Management | 25/100 | needs_improvement | URGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately |
| 🟠 Data Protection | 20/100 | needs_improvement | Implement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more |
| 🟠 Compliance & Certification | 0/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
| 🟠 Incident Response | 0/100 | needs_improvement | Document incident response plan |
Overall Grade: F (22/100)
Critical Security Gaps
| Gap | Severity | Business Impact | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟡 No public security documentation or audit reports | MEDIUM | 40-80 hours of security assessment overhead | Request security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper |
Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0
Compliance Status
| Framework | Status | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| ISO 27001 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| GDPR | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| HIPAA | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
| PCI DSS | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.
Operational Excellence
| Metric | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Status Page | ❌ Not Found | N/A |
| Documentation Quality | ❌ 0/10 | No SDKs |
| SLA Commitment | ❌ None | No public SLA |
| API Versioning | ⚠️ None | No version control |
| Support Channels | ℹ️ 0 channels |
Operational Facts Extracted: 2 data points from operational_maturity enrichment
Integration Requirements
| Aspect | Details | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Time | 3-5 days (manual setup required) | Estimated deployment timeline |
| Known Issues | Manual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls needed | Implementation considerations |
⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration
Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:
- Business email communications
- Internal collaboration content
- Customer support conversations
Risk Level: HIGH - Contains personally identifiable information (PII)
Compliance Requirements:
- GDPR - General Data Protection Regulation (EU)
- CCPA - California Consumer Privacy Act (US)
Compliance & Certifications
API Intelligence
Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Vonage.
API Intelligence
API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.
Incomplete API Intelligence
Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.
View Vendor DocumentationAI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis
LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.
CISO
Vonage Business Communications presents a communications platform with limited security visibility that requires additional due diligence before enterprise deployment. With only identity and access management controls assessed (scoring 58/100), the platform demonstrates basic authentication capabilities but lacks comprehensive security validation across critical domains.
Primary Security Concerns
The most significant risk is the absence of security assessment data across seven of eight security dimensions, including encryption protocols, compliance certifications, and infrastructure security. This data gap creates substantial blind spots for risk assessment. The identity and access management score of 58/100 indicates moderate authentication controls but suggests room for enhancement in areas like multi-factor authentication enforcement, privileged access management, or session security controls.
Without validated compliance certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR), the platform cannot demonstrate adherence to enterprise security standards typically required for business communications systems that handle sensitive customer data and internal communications. The absence of documented breach history is positive, but insufficient without broader security control validation.
For a communications platform processing voice, messaging, and potentially customer data, the lack of encryption and data protection assessment represents a critical information gap. Enterprise communications require end-to-end encryption, secure data retention policies, and robust access controls to protect against eavesdropping and unauthorized access.
CISO Recommendation
Conditional approval contingent on comprehensive security documentation review. Before deployment, require Vonage to provide current SOC 2 Type II reports, encryption specifications, data residency policies, and detailed security architecture documentation. Implement enhanced monitoring for all communications traffic and establish data loss prevention controls. Consider limiting initial deployment to non-sensitive communications until full security validation is complete.
Security Posture & Operational Capabilities
Comprehensive assessment of Vonage's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.
Operational Data Not Yet Assessed
We haven't collected operational maturity data for Vonage yet.
Security Automation APIs
Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Vonage
Vonage's security assessment reveals significant vulnerabilities with an overall security score of 22/100, resulting in an F grade. The platform struggles across multiple critical security dimensions, with particularly weak performance in Compliance & Certification and Incident Response, scoring 0/100 in these crucial areas. Identity & Access Management registers a low 25/100, while API and Infrastructure Security hover around 30/100. Data Protection scores an underwhelming 20/100. The only bright spots are Vulnerability Management (85/100) and Breach History (100/100), which marginally offset the comprehensive security shortcomings. These scores indicate substantial risk for organizations considering Vonage's platform, suggesting an urgent need for comprehensive security improvements. Security decision-makers should conduct thorough due diligence and potentially implement additional protective measures. See the Security Dimensions section for a detailed breakdown of each security category and potential mitigation strategies.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Vonage's security assessment reveals significant vulnerabilities across multiple critical dimensions, resulting in an overall security score of 22/100 and an F grade. The platform struggles most severely in Compliance & Certification and Incident Response, where scores are effectively zero. Identity and Access Management performs marginally better at 25/100, while API and Infrastructure Security hover around 30/100. Data Protection scores an underwhelming 20/100, indicating substantial security risks for potential enterprise users.
The sole bright spots are Vulnerability Management (85/100) and Breach History (perfect 100/100 score), suggesting robust historical tracking and potential for improvement. Security teams evaluating Vonage should critically examine its Identity & Access Management and Compliance frameworks, which currently present significant organizational risk. See Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of each security parameter and detailed risk assessment.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Vonage demonstrates significant security vulnerabilities, presenting substantial risks for financial data protection. With an overall security score of 22/100 and an F grade, the platform exhibits critical weaknesses across multiple security dimensions. Identity and Access Management scores only 25/100, indicating potential unauthorized access risks. API and infrastructure security both rate a low 30/100, suggesting potential entry points for cyber threats. Most concerning is a zero score in Compliance and Certification, which raises serious red flags for financial data handling.
While Vonage shows strong performance in breach history (scoring 100/100) and vulnerability management (85/100), these isolated strengths cannot compensate for systemic security gaps. Financial organizations should exercise extreme caution when considering Vonage for sensitive transactions. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of each risk area. For mission-critical financial workflows, alternative platforms with robust security credentials are strongly recommended.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Vonage's infrastructure security presents significant challenges with a low overall security score of 22/100, resulting in an F grade across critical security dimensions. The platform demonstrates substantial weaknesses in fundamental security areas, including Identity & Access Management (scoring 25/100), Compliance & Certification (0/100), and Data Protection (20/100). While Vonage exhibits strong performance in Vulnerability Management (85/100) and an unblemished Breach History, these isolated strengths cannot compensate for broader systemic security gaps.
API and Infrastructure Security hover around 30/100, indicating substantial exposure to potential cyber risks. Most concerning is the zero score in Incident Response, suggesting limited preparedness for potential security events. Enterprise security teams should conduct thorough due diligence before integrating Vonage's services, paying close attention to access controls, data protection mechanisms, and compliance frameworks.
See Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of Vonage's security posture.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Vonage presents significant security risks that make enterprise-level approval challenging. With a critically low security score of 22/100 and an "F" grade, the platform fails to meet fundamental enterprise security standards. Critical compliance certifications including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS are conspicuously absent, indicating substantial potential vulnerabilities in data protection and regulatory adherence.
Security decision-makers should conduct extensive additional due diligence before considering Vonage for sensitive business communications. The platform's low score suggests potential gaps in data governance, access controls, and regulatory compliance that could expose organizations to substantial operational and legal risks.
Enterprise risk management protocols typically require vendors to demonstrate robust security frameworks, which Vonage currently does not satisfy. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of identified security shortcomings.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Compare with Alternatives
How does Vonage stack up against similar applications in Communication & Collaboration? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.
| Application | Overall ScoreScore↓ | Grade | AI Security 🤖AI 🤖⇅ | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
56/100🏆 | B+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
52/100 | B | N/A | View ProfileView | |
49/100 | C+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
36/100 | D+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
34/100 | D | N/A | View ProfileView | |
VonageCurrent | 22/100 | F | N/A | |
22/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView |
Security Comparison Insight
16 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.