Skip to main content
Vonage logo

Vonage Security Assessment

Communication & Collaboration

Vonage Communications APIs enable you to transform your customer experiences with programmable video, voice, messaging, and more.

Data: 4/8(50%)
SECURITY VERIFIED • SAASPOSTURE • JAN 2026
F
Bottom 20%
Vonage logoVonage
SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .
22
Overall Score
Weighted average across all dimensions
F
Security Grade
Critical
65% confidence

Identity & Access Management

F
Score:0
Weight:33%
Grade:F (Critical)

Compliance & Certification

F
Score:0
Weight:19%
Grade:F (Critical)

AI Integration Security

NEW
N/A
Score:0
Weight:12%
Grade:N/A

API Security

D
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

Infrastructure Security

D
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

Data Protection

F
Score:0
Weight:10%
Grade:F (Critical)

Vulnerability Management

A+
Score:0
Weight:3%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Breach History

A+
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

F
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:F (Critical)
🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 08:46 AM

Assessment Transparency

See exactly what data backs this security assessment

Data Coverage

4/8 security categories assessed

50%
complete
Identity & Access
Available
Compliance
Missing
API Security
Available
Infrastructure
Available
Data Protection
Missing
Vulnerability Mgmt
Available
Incident Response
Missing
Breach History
Missing

Score based on 4 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.

Evaluation Friction

UNKNOWN
Estimated: Unknown
0% public documentation accessibility

Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.

13 data sources successful

Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility

Comprehensive Security Analysis

In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations

Security Analysis

Executive Summary

MetricValueAssessment
Security GradeFNeeds Improvement
Risk LevelHighNot recommended
Enterprise Readiness39%Gaps Exist
Critical Gaps0None

Security Assessment

CategoryScoreStatusAction Required
🟢 Breach History100/100excellentMaintain current controls
🟡 Vulnerability Management85/100goodMaintain current controls
🟠 API Security30/100needs_improvementAdd rate limiting and authentication
🟠 Infrastructure Security30/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 Identity & Access Management25/100needs_improvementURGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately
🟠 Data Protection20/100needs_improvementImplement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more
🟠 Compliance & Certification0/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 Incident Response0/100needs_improvementDocument incident response plan

Overall Grade: F (22/100)

Critical Security Gaps

GapSeverityBusiness ImpactRecommendation
🟡 No public security documentation or audit reportsMEDIUM40-80 hours of security assessment overheadRequest security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper

Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0

Compliance Status

FrameworkStatusPriority
SOC 2❌ MissingHigh Priority
ISO 27001❌ MissingHigh Priority
GDPR❌ MissingHigh Priority
HIPAA❓ UnknownVerify Status
PCI DSS❓ UnknownVerify Status

Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.

Operational Excellence

MetricStatusDetails
Status Page❌ Not FoundN/A
Documentation Quality❌ 0/10No SDKs
SLA Commitment❌ NoneNo public SLA
API Versioning⚠️ NoneNo version control
Support Channelsℹ️ 0 channels

Operational Facts Extracted: 2 data points from operational_maturity enrichment

Integration Requirements

AspectDetailsNotes
Setup Time3-5 days (manual setup required)Estimated deployment timeline
Known IssuesManual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls neededImplementation considerations

⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration

Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:

  • Business email communications
  • Internal collaboration content
  • Customer support conversations

Risk Level: HIGH - Contains personally identifiable information (PII)

Compliance Requirements:

  • GDPR - General Data Protection Regulation (EU)
  • CCPA - California Consumer Privacy Act (US)

Compliance & Certifications

0
Active
0
Pending
6
Not Certified

API Intelligence

Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Vonage.

API Intelligence

Incomplete

API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.

Incomplete API Intelligence

Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.

View Vendor Documentation

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

CISO

Vonage Business Communications presents a communications platform with limited security visibility that requires additional due diligence before enterprise deployment. With only identity and access management controls assessed (scoring 58/100), the platform demonstrates basic authentication capabilities but lacks comprehensive security validation across critical domains.

Primary Security Concerns

The most significant risk is the absence of security assessment data across seven of eight security dimensions, including encryption protocols, compliance certifications, and infrastructure security. This data gap creates substantial blind spots for risk assessment. The identity and access management score of 58/100 indicates moderate authentication controls but suggests room for enhancement in areas like multi-factor authentication enforcement, privileged access management, or session security controls.

Without validated compliance certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR), the platform cannot demonstrate adherence to enterprise security standards typically required for business communications systems that handle sensitive customer data and internal communications. The absence of documented breach history is positive, but insufficient without broader security control validation.

For a communications platform processing voice, messaging, and potentially customer data, the lack of encryption and data protection assessment represents a critical information gap. Enterprise communications require end-to-end encryption, secure data retention policies, and robust access controls to protect against eavesdropping and unauthorized access.

CISO Recommendation

Conditional approval contingent on comprehensive security documentation review. Before deployment, require Vonage to provide current SOC 2 Type II reports, encryption specifications, data residency policies, and detailed security architecture documentation. Implement enhanced monitoring for all communications traffic and establish data loss prevention controls. Consider limiting initial deployment to non-sensitive communications until full security validation is complete.

AI-Powered Analysis
Claude Sonnet 41,072 wordsZero fabrication

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of Vonage's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Data Not Yet Assessed

We haven't collected operational maturity data for Vonage yet.

🤖

Security Automation APIs

Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Vonage

Vonage's security assessment reveals significant vulnerabilities with an overall security score of 22/100, resulting in an F grade. The platform struggles across multiple critical security dimensions, with particularly weak performance in Compliance & Certification and Incident Response, scoring 0/100 in these crucial areas. Identity & Access Management registers a low 25/100, while API and Infrastructure Security hover around 30/100. Data Protection scores an underwhelming 20/100. The only bright spots are Vulnerability Management (85/100) and Breach History (100/100), which marginally offset the comprehensive security shortcomings. These scores indicate substantial risk for organizations considering Vonage's platform, suggesting an urgent need for comprehensive security improvements. Security decision-makers should conduct thorough due diligence and potentially implement additional protective measures. See the Security Dimensions section for a detailed breakdown of each security category and potential mitigation strategies.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Vonage's security assessment reveals significant vulnerabilities across multiple critical dimensions, resulting in an overall security score of 22/100 and an F grade. The platform struggles most severely in Compliance & Certification and Incident Response, where scores are effectively zero. Identity and Access Management performs marginally better at 25/100, while API and Infrastructure Security hover around 30/100. Data Protection scores an underwhelming 20/100, indicating substantial security risks for potential enterprise users.

The sole bright spots are Vulnerability Management (85/100) and Breach History (perfect 100/100 score), suggesting robust historical tracking and potential for improvement. Security teams evaluating Vonage should critically examine its Identity & Access Management and Compliance frameworks, which currently present significant organizational risk. See Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of each security parameter and detailed risk assessment.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Vonage demonstrates significant security vulnerabilities, presenting substantial risks for financial data protection. With an overall security score of 22/100 and an F grade, the platform exhibits critical weaknesses across multiple security dimensions. Identity and Access Management scores only 25/100, indicating potential unauthorized access risks. API and infrastructure security both rate a low 30/100, suggesting potential entry points for cyber threats. Most concerning is a zero score in Compliance and Certification, which raises serious red flags for financial data handling.

While Vonage shows strong performance in breach history (scoring 100/100) and vulnerability management (85/100), these isolated strengths cannot compensate for systemic security gaps. Financial organizations should exercise extreme caution when considering Vonage for sensitive transactions. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of each risk area. For mission-critical financial workflows, alternative platforms with robust security credentials are strongly recommended.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Vonage's infrastructure security presents significant challenges with a low overall security score of 22/100, resulting in an F grade across critical security dimensions. The platform demonstrates substantial weaknesses in fundamental security areas, including Identity & Access Management (scoring 25/100), Compliance & Certification (0/100), and Data Protection (20/100). While Vonage exhibits strong performance in Vulnerability Management (85/100) and an unblemished Breach History, these isolated strengths cannot compensate for broader systemic security gaps.

API and Infrastructure Security hover around 30/100, indicating substantial exposure to potential cyber risks. Most concerning is the zero score in Incident Response, suggesting limited preparedness for potential security events. Enterprise security teams should conduct thorough due diligence before integrating Vonage's services, paying close attention to access controls, data protection mechanisms, and compliance frameworks.

See Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of Vonage's security posture.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Vonage presents significant security risks that make enterprise-level approval challenging. With a critically low security score of 22/100 and an "F" grade, the platform fails to meet fundamental enterprise security standards. Critical compliance certifications including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS are conspicuously absent, indicating substantial potential vulnerabilities in data protection and regulatory adherence.

Security decision-makers should conduct extensive additional due diligence before considering Vonage for sensitive business communications. The platform's low score suggests potential gaps in data governance, access controls, and regulatory compliance that could expose organizations to substantial operational and legal risks.

Enterprise risk management protocols typically require vendors to demonstrate robust security frameworks, which Vonage currently does not satisfy. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of identified security shortcomings.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Compare with Alternatives

How does Vonage stack up against similar applications in Communication & Collaboration? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application
Score
Grade
AI 🤖
Action
56🏆
B+N/AView
52
BN/AView
49
C+N/AView
36
D+N/AView
34
DN/AView
VonageCurrent
22
FN/A
22
FN/AView
💡

Security Comparison Insight

16 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.