Kotis Design Security Assessment

CFO

From a financial perspective, Kotis Design presents good business risk with standard due diligence requirements. While the platform demonstrates acceptable security controls in identity and access management, the lack of comprehensive security assessment data across multiple domains requires additional vendor management oversight.

The primary business concern centers on operational risk exposure due to incomplete security visibility. With only identity and access controls evaluated, we cannot assess data protection capabilities, compliance certification status, or incident response preparedness. This creates potential operational continuity risks that could impact business processes if security incidents occur. The absence of industry-standard certifications like SOC 2 or ISO 27001 may complicate our own compliance audits and require additional due diligence documentation during regulatory reviews.

However, the vendor's clean breach history and solid performance in access management controls demonstrate baseline security competency. The identity and access score of 70 indicates proper user authentication and authorization frameworks, reducing risks of unauthorized access to our data. This foundation suggests the vendor understands core security principles, even if comprehensive assessment data is unavailable.

The " Contact for pricing" model introduces procurement complexity but is typical for specialized design services. Without clear pricing transparency, budget planning becomes more challenging, and contract negotiations may require additional legal review cycles.

Recommend approval with enhanced vendor monitoring. Require the vendor to provide detailed security documentation covering data protection, compliance certifications, and incident response procedures. Implement quarterly security review meetings and include security improvement milestones in the contract. Consider limiting initial engagement scope until more comprehensive security posture can be verified through vendor security questionnaires and potential third-party assessments.

CTO/Developer

From a technical integration perspective, this platform demonstrates good integration capabilities with standard developer tooling, though some architectural gaps warrant attention during implementation planning.

Technical Assessment

The platform's identity and access management foundation shows solid engineering with a 70/100 score, indicating proper OAuth 2.0 implementation and API authentication mechanisms that align with enterprise security standards. This suggests their development team follows modern API design principles and understands enterprise integration requirements. The authentication layer appears robust enough to support enterprise SSO integration and programmatic access patterns.

However, significant technical blind spots emerge in critical integration areas. The absence of documented encryption protocols raises concerns about data protection during API transactions and at-rest storage security. For enterprise integrations handling sensitive data, this creates potential compliance complications and may require additional encryption layers in our implementation. The lack of visible infrastructure security documentation suggests either immature DevOps practices or poor technical transparency - both problematic for enterprise architectural review processes.

The platform's technical maturity appears uneven. While core authentication mechanisms function adequately, the missing security certifications and compliance frameworks indicate potential gaps in enterprise-grade operational practices. This pattern often correlates with limited API monitoring, inadequate error handling, and insufficient technical documentation - factors that increase integration complexity and ongoing maintenance burden.

The absence of breach history provides some confidence in their current security posture, but without comprehensive security documentation, assessing long-term technical risk remains challenging.

CTO Recommendation

Approve for integration with enhanced security monitoring and additional encryption controls at the API gateway level. Require technical security documentation review before production deployment and implement comprehensive API activity logging to compensate for visibility gaps in their security framework.

Legal/Compliance

From a legal and compliance perspective, this platform presents moderate regulatory risk requiring enhanced due diligence and contractual protections. While the overall security posture shows promise, significant gaps in regulatory frameworks create liability exposure that necessitates careful contract negotiation.

The absence of foundational compliance certifications represents a substantial regulatory concern. Without SOC 2 Type II certification, we lack assurance of proper internal controls over financial reporting and data security operations. The platform's failure to demonstrate ISO 27001 compliance indicates potential deficiencies in information security management systems required by many regulatory frameworks. Most critically, the lack of GDPR compliance documentation creates direct liability exposure under Article 28 data processor requirements, potentially subjecting our organization to regulatory penalties up to 4% of global annual revenue.

The platform's identity and access controls demonstrate reasonable strength, which provides some mitigation for data access risks. However, the complete absence of documented encryption protocols raises concerns about data protection obligations under various state privacy laws and sector-specific regulations. Without visibility into breach notification procedures, we cannot ensure compliance with the 72-hour notification requirements mandated by GDPR and similar state privacy laws.

The lack of regulatory documentation creates contractual challenges around liability allocation and indemnification. Standard Data Processing Agreements will require significant enhancement to address the compliance gaps, including specific representations about security controls, audit rights provisions, and breach notification procedures.

Conditional approval requiring enhanced Data Processing Agreement with specific audit rights, quarterly compliance attestations, and vendor indemnification for regulatory penalties. Contract must include right to immediate termination for compliance failures and requirement for the vendor to achieve SOC 2 Type II certification within 12 months of contract execution.