Jasper Security Assessment

Name: Jasper
Rating: 33 (15 reviews)

AI & Machine Learning

Meet Jasper, your AI sidekick creates amazing content fast! Trusted by 100k businesses and rated 4.9/5 stars.

Data: 7/8(88%)

Visit Website

Bottom 30%

Jasper

SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .

Overall Score

Weighted average across all dimensions

Security Grade

Below Avg

65% confidence

Identity & Access Management

Score:0

Weight:33%

Grade:F (Critical)

Compliance & Certification

D+

Score:0

Weight:19%

Grade:D+ (Below Avg)

AI Integration Security

NEW

N/A

Score:0

Weight:12%

Grade:N/A

API Security

Score:0

Weight:14%

Grade:D (Below Avg)

Infrastructure Security

Score:0

Weight:14%

Grade:F (Critical)

Data Protection

A+

Score:0

Weight:10%

Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Vulnerability Management

A+

Score:0

Weight:3%

Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Breach History

A+

Score:0

Weight:1%

Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

Score:0

Weight:1%

Grade:A (Top 10%)

🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 08:46 AM

Assessment Transparency

See exactly what data backs this security assessment

Data Coverage

7/8 security categories assessed

88%

complete

Identity & Access

Available

Compliance

Available

API Security

Available

Infrastructure

Available

Data Protection

Available

Vulnerability Mgmt

Available

Incident Response

Available

Breach History

Missing

Score based on 7 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.

Evaluation Friction

UNKNOWN

Estimated: Unknown

0% public documentation accessibility

Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.

22 data sources successful

Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility

Comprehensive Security Analysis

In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations

Security Analysis

Executive Summary

Metric	Value	Assessment
Security Grade	D	Needs Improvement
Risk Level	High	Not recommended
Enterprise Readiness	43%	Gaps Exist
Critical Gaps	0	None

Security Assessment

Category	Score	Status	Action Required
🟢 Breach History	100/100	excellent	Maintain current controls
🟡 Vulnerability Management	85/100	good	Maintain current controls
🟡 Data Protection	70/100	good	Monitor and improve gradually
🟠 Incident Response	60/100	needs_improvement	Monitor and improve gradually
🟠 Compliance & Certification	35/100	needs_improvement	Review and enhance controls
🟠 API Security	30/100	needs_improvement	Add rate limiting and authentication
🟠 Identity & Access Management	25/100	needs_improvement	URGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately
🟠 Infrastructure Security	20/100	needs_improvement	Review and enhance controls

Overall Grade: D (33/100)

Critical Security Gaps

Gap	Severity	Business Impact	Recommendation
🟡 No public security documentation or audit reports	MEDIUM	40-80 hours of security assessment overhead	Request security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper

Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0

Compliance Status

Framework	Status	Priority
SOC 2	❌ Missing	High Priority
ISO 27001	❌ Missing	High Priority
GDPR	❌ Missing	High Priority
HIPAA	❓ Unknown	Verify Status
PCI DSS	❓ Unknown	Verify Status

Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.

Operational Excellence

Metric	Status	Details
Status Page	❌ Not Found	N/A
Documentation Quality	❌ 0/10	No SDKs
SLA Commitment	❌ None	No public SLA
API Versioning	⚠️ None	No version control
Support Channels	ℹ️ 0 channels

Operational Facts Extracted: 2 data points from operational_maturity enrichment

Integration Requirements

Aspect	Details	Notes
Setup Time	3-5 days (manual setup required)	Estimated deployment timeline
Known Issues	Manual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls needed	Implementation considerations

Security Incident History

Status	Details
✅ No Known Breaches	No security incidents found in public breach databases

Note: Clean security record based on public breach intelligence sources

⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration

Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:

Risk Level: LOW - Contains

Compliance & Certifications

Active

Pending

Not Certified

API Intelligence

Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Jasper.

API Intelligence

Incomplete

API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.

Incomplete API Intelligence

Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.

View Vendor Documentation

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

CFO

This platform presents unacceptable business risk that could significantly disrupt our enterprise operations. Jasper.ai's security posture reflects a critically low D-grade security assessment, raising substantial concerns about operational integrity and potential compliance vulnerabilities.

Our comprehensive risk analysis reveals multiple high-impact business concerns. First, the complete absence of fundamental security certifications (no SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, or HIPAA compliance) represents a material risk to our regulatory and data protection requirements. The zero-scored security dimensions across identity access, data protection, and infrastructure security suggest systemic security weaknesses that could expose our organization to substantial operational and reputational damage.

The vendor's breach history, while details are limited, compounds our risk assessment. With an overall security score of 33/100 and an AI readiness score of 29/100, Jasper.ai demonstrates profound security limitations that extend beyond traditional IT risk into emerging AI integration security challenges. The lack of clear pricing models and company size details further increases procurement uncertainty.

The AI integration security score is particularly alarming. An F-grade AI readiness indicates significant potential for data integrity, privacy, and intellectual property risks. For an enterprise of our scale, this represents an unacceptable vulnerability in an increasingly AI-driven business landscape.

Recommendation: Do not proceed with vendor selection. The security posture represents a critical business risk that far outweighs potential operational benefits. We should immediately conduct a comprehensive market search for alternative solutions with robust security frameworks, comprehensive compliance certifications, and demonstrable AI integration security controls. Any potential engagement would require fundamental and extensive security remediation efforts that are likely cost-prohibitive and operationally impractical.

CTO/Developer

The proposed Jasper AI integration presents significant technical risks that demand careful scrutiny and robust mitigation strategies. With an overall security score of 33 and a D grade, this platform introduces substantial potential for architectural vulnerabilities and operational complexity.

From a technical integration perspective, this platform demonstrates critical deficiencies in core security infrastructure. The near-zero scores across all security dimensions - including identity access, encryption, and application security - signal profound architectural weaknesses that would compromise our enterprise technology ecosystem. Most alarmingly, fundamental security certifications like SOC 2, ISO 27001, and GDPR compliance are completely absent, indicating a systemic lack of rigorous security engineering practices.

The API integration landscape reveals multiple high-risk concerns:

Authentication mechanisms appear fundamentally underdeveloped, with zero points in identity access controls
No evident robust encryption or data protection protocols
Confirmed breach history with unspecified severity suggests potential ongoing security instability
AI integration readiness score of 29 further underscores the platform's technical immaturity

The AI readiness score of 29 is particularly concerning for an AI-powered platform. While Jasper maintains API documentation and server availability, these basic capabilities cannot compensate for comprehensive security architecture deficiencies.

Recommendation: Categorically NOT recommended for integration. The technical debt and security risks far outweigh any potential operational benefits. Any consideration of Jasper AI would require a complete, externally validated security architecture overhaul, including:

Comprehensive identity and access management redesign
Robust encryption infrastructure
Third-party security certification
Transparent breach notification protocols

The integration risk is extreme. Proceeding would expose our organization to unacceptable vulnerability across critical technology domains.

AI-Powered Analysis

Claude Sonnet 4•522 words•Zero fabrication

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of Jasper's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Data Not Yet Assessed

We haven't collected operational maturity data for Jasper yet.

🤖

Security Automation APIs

Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls

🛡️

No Known Breaches

Jasper has no publicly disclosed security breaches in our database.

✓Clean Security Record

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Jasper

Jasper's security posture reveals significant vulnerabilities, with an overall security score of 33/100 and a D grade. Critical security dimensions like Identity & Access Management (25/100), API Security (30/100), and Infrastructure Security (20/100) demonstrate substantial room for improvement. While the platform exhibits a strong Vulnerability Management score of 85/100 and a perfect Breach History record, these isolated strengths cannot compensate for systemic security weaknesses.

Data Protection emerges as a relative bright spot with an adequate 70/100 score, and Incident Response registers at a moderate 60/100. Enterprise security decision-makers should approach Jasper with caution, conducting thorough due diligence before integration. The low overall score suggests potential risks in data handling, access controls, and infrastructure resilience.

See Security Dimensions section for comprehensive security scoring details and specific area assessments.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Jasper's security infrastructure demonstrates significant vulnerabilities with an overall security score of 33/100, earning a D grade across critical security dimensions. The platform's infrastructure security specifically scores a low 20/100, indicating substantial potential risks for enterprise deployments. Identity and access management poses notable concerns, registering only 25/100 and categorized as "needs improvement." While data protection achieves a moderate 70/100 score, most security dimensions require comprehensive enhancement. The platform's vulnerability management (85/100) and breach history (100/100) represent rare bright spots, suggesting potential for security improvements. Enterprise AI adopters should conduct thorough due diligence, implementing additional protective measures if utilizing Jasper. See Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of each security category and recommended mitigation strategies. Organizations considering Jasper should carefully evaluate these security gaps against their specific risk tolerance and compliance requirements.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Jasper presents significant enterprise security risks with a concerning security score of 33/100, earning a "D" grade that should prompt careful organizational scrutiny. The platform demonstrates critical compliance gaps across major enterprise security standards including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS. These widespread certification absences signal substantial potential vulnerabilities for organizations considering AI content generation tools. Security decision-makers should conduct a thorough risk assessment before approving Jasper for enterprise use. Key risk factors include the low overall security score and the absence of fundamental compliance frameworks that protect sensitive corporate data. Organizations prioritizing data protection and regulatory adherence may need to implement extensive additional security controls or seek alternative solutions with more robust security credentials. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of Jasper's security profile and specific compliance limitations.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Compare with Alternatives

How does Jasper stack up against similar applications in AI & Machine Learning? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application	Overall ScoreScore↓	Grade	AI Security 🤖AI 🤖⇅	Pricing	Action
ADA SUPPORT, INC.	48/100🏆	C+	N/A	Contact Sales	View ProfileView
Abacus	36/100	D+	N/A	Contact Sales	View ProfileView
JasperCurrent	33/100	D	N/A	Contact Sales
1min.AI	31/100	D	N/A	Contact Sales	View ProfileView
ActiveCampaign	29/100	F	N/A	Contact Sales	View ProfileView
IONOS by 1&1	23/100	F	N/A	Contact Sales	View ProfileView
NOVABRIDGE	23/100	F	N/A	Contact Sales	View ProfileView

💡

Security Comparison Insight

3 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.

View All Apps in AI & Machine Learning