Integrate.io Security Assessment
Data & Analytics
Integrate.io launched in 2022 when Xplenty, FlyData, Dreamfactory and Intermix.io were brought together to create the Integrate.io platform. Finally use all of your data to get deep insights that drive your go-to-market success. The Integrate.io platform allows you to quickly unify your data for easy analysis to help lower your CAC, increase your ROAS, and deliver deep customer personalization that drive buying habits.
9-Dimension Security Framework
Identity & Access Management
Compliance & Certification
AI Integration Security
NEWAPI Security
Infrastructure Security
Data Protection
Vulnerability Management
Breach History
Incident Response
AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)
Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.
Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 06:06 PM
Assessment Transparency
See exactly what data backs this security assessment
Data Coverage
4/8 security categories assessed
Score based on 4 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.
Evaluation Friction
Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.
Security Documentation
These documents were discovered during automated assessment and may contain additional security information not reflected in the score.
Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility
AI Integration Security
🔒 9th DimensionAssess whether Integrate.io is safe for AI agent integration. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards.
AI Readiness
Infrastructure for AI integration
AI Security
Safety controls for AI agents
Comprehensive Security Analysis
In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations
Security Analysis
Executive Summary
| Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Security Grade | D+ | Needs Improvement |
| Risk Level | High | Not recommended |
| Enterprise Readiness | 46% | Gaps Exist |
| Critical Gaps | 0 | None |
Security Assessment
| Category | Score | Status | Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟢 Breach History | 100/100 | excellent | Maintain current controls |
| 🟡 Vulnerability Management | 85/100 | good | Maintain current controls |
| 🟠 Identity & Access Management | 60/100 | needs_improvement | Monitor and improve gradually |
| 🟠 Incident Response | 60/100 | needs_improvement | Monitor and improve gradually |
| 🟠 API Security | 50/100 | needs_improvement | Add rate limiting and authentication |
| 🟠 Data Protection | 30/100 | needs_improvement | Implement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more |
| 🟠 Infrastructure Security | 20/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
| 🟠 Compliance & Certification | 0/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
Overall Grade: D+ (39/100)
Critical Security Gaps
| Gap | Severity | Business Impact | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟡 No public security documentation or audit reports | MEDIUM | 40-80 hours of security assessment overhead | Request security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper |
Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0
Compliance Status
| Framework | Status | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| ISO 27001 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| GDPR | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| HIPAA | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
| PCI DSS | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.
Operational Excellence
| Metric | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Status Page | ❌ Not Found | N/A |
| Documentation Quality | ❌ 0/10 | No SDKs |
| SLA Commitment | ❌ None | No public SLA |
| API Versioning | ⚠️ None | No version control |
| Support Channels | ℹ️ 0 channels |
Operational Facts Extracted: 2 data points from operational_maturity enrichment
Integration Requirements
| Aspect | Details | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Time | 3-5 days (manual setup required) | Estimated deployment timeline |
| Known Issues | Manual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls needed | Implementation considerations |
⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration
Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:
- Business performance metrics and KPIs
- Customer behavior analytics
- Revenue and financial analytics
Risk Level: MEDIUM - Contains
Compliance & Certifications
AI Integration Security Assessment
Industry-first assessment evaluating whether Integrate.io is safe and ready for AI agent integration. Covers AI security controls and readiness infrastructure for Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP).
AI Integration Security
Industry-first assessment for AI agent safety
✅Excellent Security Features
- ●2-Factor Authentication article listed in Connectivity And Security section with 51 articles
- ●Amazon's data center operations have been accredited under: ISO 27001 SOC 1 and SOC 2/SSAE 16/ISAE 3402
- ●2-Factor Authentication available
- ●SSL/TLS encryption on all websites and microservices
- ●Role-Based Access Control on API endpoints
⚠️Security Gaps & Recommendations
- ●No token expiration
- ●No token rotation
- ●No service accounts
- ●No training opt out
- ●No read only tokens
- ●No audit logging
- ●No ai attribution
- ●No rate limiting
- ●No webhooks
- ●No security program
AI Integration Security evaluates whether Integrate.io is safe for AI agent access. This assessment considers authentication strength, access controls, observability capabilities, and data privacy protections when APIs are accessed by AI systems like Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, or custom AI agents.
AI Readiness Assessment
Evaluates readiness for AI agent integration
Official or community MCP server support
API docs, SDKs, code examples
API reference, auth flows, error handling
MCP Server Available
communityIntegrate.io supports Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) for secure AI agent integration.
💡Recommendations
- →❌ Poor AI readiness - not recommended for AI workflows
AI Readiness measures whether Integrate.ioprovides the infrastructure and developer resources necessary for secure AI agent integration. High readiness indicates official MCP server support, comprehensive API documentation, and developer-friendly tools.
API Intelligence
Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Integrate.io.
API Intelligence
API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.
Incomplete API Intelligence
Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.
View Vendor DocumentationAI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis
LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.
Security Posture & Operational Capabilities
Comprehensive assessment of Integrate.io's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.
Operational Data Not Yet Assessed
We haven't collected operational maturity data for Integrate.io yet.
Security Automation APIs
Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Integrate.io
API documentation should include examples of each call, parameters, and expected responses. Code samples for commonly used languages such as Java, JavaScript, PHP, and Python should be provided. Each API request should be explained in detail, including sample error messages and troubleshooting tips.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
APIs define how data is requested, sent, and received—making connections between systems possible. API integration: The process of using APIs to connect systems, enabling seamless data exchanges and coordinated functionality across applications, platforms, departments, and environments.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
ExpressJs (NodeJs), SpringBoot (JAVA) and Flask are fairly easy and efficient in terms of creating a web REST API in my opinion.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
API standards cover various aspects of security, including authentication, authorization, data encryption, and session management. They ensure that the communication over APIs adheres to a secure framework, preventing unauthorized access and data breaches.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Compare with Alternatives
How does Integrate.io stack up against similar applications in Data & Analytics? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.
| Application | Overall ScoreScore↓ | Grade | AI Security 🤖AI 🤖⇅ | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
44/100🏆 | C | N/A | View ProfileView | |
40/100 | C | N/A | View ProfileView | |
Integrate.ioCurrent | 39/100 | D+ | 50.5/100 | |
39/100 | D+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
30/100 | D | N/A | View ProfileView | |
29/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
28/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView |
Security Comparison Insight
7 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.