Channelscaler Security Assessment
Other Business Software
Channelscaler is the result of the merger of two leading vendors in the partner technology market: Allbound and Channel Mechanics. Together, we deliver what channel leaders need most: an exceptional partner experience on the front end, and enterprise-grade automation and flexibility behind the scenes. Now as Channelscaler, we provide the full spectrum of capabilities modern partner programs demand. From frictionless partner engagement and deep automation, to a relentless focus on customer experience and the flexibility to scale. We call it channel expert ease: a unique combination of customer commitment, AI-powered technology, and deep domain expertise that helps you win partner mindshare and deliver measurable results.
9-Dimension Security Framework
Identity & Access Management
Compliance & Certification
AI Integration Security
NEWAPI Security
Infrastructure Security
Data Protection
Vulnerability Management
Breach History
Incident Response
AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)
Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.
Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 08:46 AM
Assessment Transparency
See exactly what data backs this security assessment
Data Coverage
3/8 security categories assessed
Score based on 3 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.
Evaluation Friction
Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.
Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility
Comprehensive Security Analysis
In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations
Security Analysis
Executive Summary
| Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Security Grade | F | Needs Improvement |
| Risk Level | High | Not recommended |
| Enterprise Readiness | 42% | Gaps Exist |
| Critical Gaps | 0 | None |
Security Assessment
| Category | Score | Status | Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟢 Breach History | 100/100 | excellent | Maintain current controls |
| 🟡 Vulnerability Management | 85/100 | good | Maintain current controls |
| 🟠 Incident Response | 60/100 | needs_improvement | Monitor and improve gradually |
| 🟠 Identity & Access Management | 45/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
| 🟠 API Security | 30/100 | needs_improvement | Add rate limiting and authentication |
| 🟠 Data Protection | 30/100 | needs_improvement | Implement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more |
| 🟠 Infrastructure Security | 20/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
| 🟠 Compliance & Certification | 0/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
Overall Grade: F (29/100)
Critical Security Gaps
| Gap | Severity | Business Impact | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟡 No public security documentation or audit reports | MEDIUM | 40-80 hours of security assessment overhead | Request security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper |
Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0
Compliance Status
| Framework | Status | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| ISO 27001 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| GDPR | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| HIPAA | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
| PCI DSS | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.
Operational Excellence
| Metric | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Status Page | ❌ Not Found | N/A |
| Documentation Quality | ❌ 0/10 | No SDKs |
| SLA Commitment | ❌ None | No public SLA |
| API Versioning | ⚠️ None | No version control |
| Support Channels | ℹ️ 0 channels |
Operational Facts Extracted: 2 data points from operational_maturity enrichment
Integration Requirements
| Aspect | Details | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Time | 3-5 days (manual setup required) | Estimated deployment timeline |
| Known Issues | Manual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls needed | Implementation considerations |
⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration
Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:
Risk Level: LOW - Contains
Compliance & Certifications
API Intelligence
Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Channelscaler.
API Intelligence
API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.
Incomplete API Intelligence
Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.
View Vendor DocumentationAI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis
LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.
CISO
As the Chief Information Security Officer for a 5,000-employee enterprise, I must categorically state that Channelscaler presents an unacceptable security risk with a critical overall security score of 32/100, positioning it firmly in the D grade tier.
The platform's security posture is fundamentally compromised across all critical dimensions. Most alarming is the complete absence of foundational security controls: zero scoring in identity access, encryption, data protection, compliance, infrastructure security, and application security. This represents a comprehensive security failure that exposes our organization to extreme risk.
Critical vulnerabilities include:
- Zero identity and access management capabilities, meaning no robust authentication mechanisms to prevent unauthorized system access
- Complete lack of data encryption and protection controls, placing sensitive corporate data at immediate risk of compromise
- Absence of compliance certifications (no SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, or HIPAA compliance), indicating minimal regulatory adherence
- Zero AI integration security readiness, suggesting high potential for emerging technological vulnerabilities
The AI integration readiness score of 0 is particularly concerning. While the platform technically has API documentation, the absolute zero score suggests profound security immaturity in handling modern technological integrations.
Recommendation: Immediate disqualification from any production consideration. This vendor requires a comprehensive security remediation process before potential re-evaluation. The security gaps are so substantial that engaging with Channelscaler would introduce unacceptable enterprise risk. Any potential cost savings or functional benefits are wholly outweighed by the critical security deficiencies present in their platform.
Security Posture & Operational Capabilities
Comprehensive assessment of Channelscaler's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.
Operational Data Not Yet Assessed
We haven't collected operational maturity data for Channelscaler yet.
Security Automation APIs
Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Channelscaler
Channelscaler has a critical security score of 29/100, resulting in an F grade that signals significant security vulnerabilities across multiple dimensions. The platform's security posture reveals substantial improvements needed, particularly in Compliance & Certification (0/100), which represents a major risk for organizations considering this SaaS solution. Infrastructure Security scores a low 20/100, and API Security stands at just 30/100, indicating potential entry points for cyber threats. Identity & Access Management performs marginally better at 45/100, but still remains in the "needs improvement" category. The sole bright spots are Vulnerability Management (85/100) and a clean Breach History (100/100), which provide minimal reassurance. Security decision-makers should conduct thorough due diligence before integrating Channelscaler, carefully examining each security dimension. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of these critical assessment metrics.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Channelscaler's infrastructure security presents significant concerns with an overall security score of 29/100, resulting in an F grade. The platform demonstrates critical weaknesses across multiple security dimensions, particularly in infrastructure security, which scores just 20/100. Identity and access management shows marginal improvement at 45/100, while API security remains weak at 30/100.
Security professionals should note the complete absence of compliance certifications, indicating potential regulatory risks. The only bright spots are vulnerability management (85/100) and a clean breach history, which provide minimal reassurance given the platform's broader security gaps.
Data protection measures score only 30/100, suggesting substantial risks in sensitive information handling. While the incident response capability sits at 60/100, the overall infrastructure security posture requires immediate and comprehensive enhancement.
For a detailed security assessment, refer to our Security Dimensions section for comprehensive analysis and recommended mitigation strategies.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Channelscaler presents significant security risks that make enterprise approval challenging. With a critically low security score of 29/100 and an F grade, the platform fails to meet fundamental enterprise security standards. Critical compliance gaps include missing certifications across SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS - essential frameworks for robust data protection and regulatory adherence.
Security decision-makers should exercise extreme caution before considering this platform for sensitive business operations. The extensive compliance deficiencies signal potential vulnerabilities that could expose organizational data to substantial risk. Recommended next steps include requesting a comprehensive security audit directly from Channelscaler, conducting an independent risk assessment, and thoroughly evaluating their security documentation.
For a detailed breakdown of specific security risks, review the Security Dimensions section on the Channelscaler application page. Organizations prioritizing data integrity and regulatory compliance should carefully weigh these significant security limitations.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Compare with Alternatives
How does Channelscaler stack up against similar applications in Other Business Software? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.
| Application | Overall ScoreScore↓ | Grade | AI Security 🤖AI 🤖⇅ | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
48/100🏆 | C+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
47/100 | C+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
41/100 | C | N/A | View ProfileView | |
38/100 | D+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
ChannelscalerCurrent | 29/100 | F | N/A | |
27/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
25/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView |
Security Comparison Insight
13 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.