Skip to main content
Buddy logo

Buddy Security Assessment

Development & DevOps

Code, build and deploy with no effort

Data: 3/8(38%)
HIGH Friction
SECURITY VERIFIED • SAASPOSTURE • JAN 2026
A
Top 10%
Buddy logoBuddy
SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .
63
Overall Score
Weighted average across all dimensions
A
Security Grade
Top 10%
65% confidence

Identity & Access Management

A+
Score:0
Weight:33%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Compliance & Certification

D+
Score:0
Weight:19%
Grade:D+ (Below Avg)

AI Integration Security

NEW
A
Score:0
Weight:12%
Grade:A (Top 10%)

API Security

A
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:A (Top 10%)

Infrastructure Security

D
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

Data Protection

B+
Score:0
Weight:10%
Grade:B+ (Top 25%)

Vulnerability Management

A+
Score:0
Weight:3%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Breach History

A+
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

A
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A (Top 10%)
🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 06:09 PM

Assessment Transparency

See exactly what data backs this security assessment

Data Coverage

3/8 security categories assessed

38%
complete
Identity & Access
Available
Compliance
Missing
API Security
Available
Infrastructure
Available
Data Protection
Missing
Vulnerability Mgmt
Missing
Incident Response
Missing
Breach History
Missing

Score based on 3 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.

Evaluation Friction

HIGH
Estimated: 4+ weeks
0% public documentation accessibility

Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.

12 data sources successful

Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility

🤖

AI Integration Security

🔒 9th Dimension

Assess whether Buddy is safe for AI agent integration. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards.

🔌

AI Readiness

Infrastructure for AI integration

F
21/100
MCP Available
🔌 MCP Server0/100
👨‍💻 Developer Experience0/100
📚 Documentation70/100
Top Recommendation:
❌ Poor AI readiness - not recommended for AI workflows
🛡️

AI Security

Safety controls for AI agents

A
61.8/100
CAUTION
🔐 Authentication60%
🔒 Access Control100%
👁️ Observability55%
🔏 Data Privacy35%
✅ Excellent Security:
OAuth 2.0 Introduction and Personal Access Token documentation indicates OAuth 2.0 is supported with scopes, and the API documentation shows extensive permission management for workspaces, projects, pipelines, and integrations
⚠️ Needs Attention:
No token expiration
🛡️Unique Assessment: Evaluating AI agent integration safety helps you make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors

Essential Security Analysis

Based on available security assessment data

63
Security Score
A
Security Grade
0
Compliance Frameworks

Compliance & Certifications

0
Active
0
Pending
6
Not Certified

AI Integration Security Assessment

Industry-first assessment evaluating whether Buddy is safe and ready for AI agent integration. Covers AI security controls and readiness infrastructure for Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP).

AI Integration Security

Industry-first assessment for AI agent safety

A
GRADE
Top 10%
61.8
AI Security Score
🔐Authentication
60
🛡️Access Control
100
👁️Observability
55
🔒Data Privacy
35
📊Confidence Score
94%
CAUTION

Excellent Security Features

  • OAuth 2.0 Introduction and Personal Access Token documentation indicates OAuth 2.0 is supported with scopes, and the API documentation shows extensive permission management for workspaces, projects, pipelines, and integrations
  • GDPR listed on security page as a compliance feature
  • Custom users roles, Group permissions, Pipeline permissions with None/Deny, Project role, View-only, Run-only, and Manage levels. Permission sets can be created and managed by admins.
  • Access audit logs mentioned on security page, and administrators can 'Browse workspace access logs'
  • Administrators can 'Add webhooks to external services' and pipeline triggering via Webhook is documented
  • SOC2 Type II certification listed on security page
  • Responsible Disclosure program mentioned in footer/security page
  • SOC 2 Type II certified
  • GDPR compliant with responsible disclosure program
  • Granular pipeline permissions with view-only and run-only options

⚠️Security Gaps & Recommendations

  • No token expiration
  • No token rotation
  • No pii redaction
  • No training opt out
  • No ai attribution
  • No rate limiting
  • No documented token expiration or rotation policies
  • No PII redaction capabilities documented
  • No AI training opt-out options documented
ℹ️

AI Integration Security evaluates whether Buddy is safe for AI agent access. This assessment considers authentication strength, access controls, observability capabilities, and data privacy protections when APIs are accessed by AI systems like Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, or custom AI agents.

AI Readiness Assessment

Evaluates readiness for AI agent integration

F
GRADE
Critical
21.0
AI Readiness Score
🔌
MCP Server Availability(40% weight)

Official or community MCP server support

0
👨‍💻
Developer Experience(30% weight)

API docs, SDKs, code examples

0
📚
Documentation Quality(30% weight)

API reference, auth flows, error handling

70

MCP Server Available

community

Buddy supports Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) for secure AI agent integration.

💡Recommendations

  • ❌ Poor AI readiness - not recommended for AI workflows
📊Confidence Score
70%
🕐Last Verified
1/7/2026
ℹ️

AI Readiness measures whether Buddyprovides the infrastructure and developer resources necessary for secure AI agent integration. High readiness indicates official MCP server support, comprehensive API documentation, and developer-friendly tools.

API Intelligence

Production-ready code examples for security operations, extracted from official Buddy API documentation using LLM analysis. Copy and paste these examples directly into your automation workflows.

API Intelligence

Incomplete

API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.

Incomplete API Intelligence

Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.

View Vendor Documentation

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of Buddy's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Data Not Yet Assessed

We haven't collected operational maturity data for Buddy yet.

🤖

Security Automation APIs

Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls

Compare with Alternatives

How does Buddy stack up against similar applications in Development & DevOps? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application
Score
Grade
AI 🤖
Action
BuddyCurrent
63🏆
A61.8
54
BN/AView
49
C+N/AView
40
CN/AView
40
CN/AView
38
D+N/AView
23
FN/AView
💡

Security Comparison Insight

Buddy has the highest security score (63/100) among these alternatives. Strong choice for security-conscious organizations.