Bigtincan Platform Security Assessment
Other Business Software
Empower your customer-facing teams to prepare, engage, measure, and continually improve the buying experience with Bigtincan.
9-Dimension Security Framework
Identity & Access Management
Compliance & Certification
AI Integration Security
NEWAPI Security
Infrastructure Security
Data Protection
Vulnerability Management
Breach History
Incident Response
AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)
Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.
Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 08:46 AM
Assessment Transparency
See exactly what data backs this security assessment
Data Coverage
5/8 security categories assessed
Score based on 5 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.
Evaluation Friction
Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.
Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility
Essential Security Analysis
Based on available security assessment data
Compliance & Certifications
API Intelligence
Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Bigtincan Platform.
API Intelligence
API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.
Incomplete API Intelligence
Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.
View Vendor DocumentationAI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis
LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.
CFO
This platform presents mixed business risk requiring additional due diligence and compensating controls. The Bigtincan Platform's security posture reveals substantial operational vulnerabilities that demand rigorous enterprise risk management.
Our primary business concerns center on three critical dimensions: compliance exposure, operational stability, and vendor risk management. With an overall security score of 44 (Grade C), the platform demonstrates significant compliance gaps that could materially impact our enterprise risk profile. The complete absence of fundamental security certifications - no SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, or HIPAA compliance - represents a substantial governance risk for a 5,000-employee organization.
The lack of mature security controls is particularly concerning across multiple risk dimensions. Zero scores in identity access, encryption, data protection, and threat intelligence suggest systemic security weaknesses that could introduce significant operational complexity. These gaps could potentially expose our organization to unexpected compliance remediation costs, data protection challenges, and potential regulatory scrutiny.
The platform's AI integration readiness score of zero compounds our risk assessment, indicating potential technological immaturity that could compromise our strategic technology investments. While the vendor has not disclosed a known breach history, the comprehensive security deficiencies suggest inherent vulnerabilities that merit extensive review.
Recommendation: Conditional approval requiring comprehensive third-party security assessment, mandatory security enhancement roadmap, and quarterly compliance audits. We must mandate specific compensating controls, including:
- Comprehensive identity and access management review
- Detailed encryption and data protection validation
- Independent security certification process
- Mandatory AI security integration assessment
The vendor must demonstrate a clear, time-bound plan to address these critical security gaps before full procurement consideration. Our risk tolerance cannot accommodate such extensive security limitations without robust mitigation strategies.
Security Posture & Operational Capabilities
Comprehensive assessment of Bigtincan Platform's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.
Operational Maturity
Support, SLAs, and documentation quality
Support Channels
Security Automation APIs
Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Bigtincan Platform
Bigtincan Platform's security assessment reveals a mixed security profile with a C-grade overall score of 44/100. The platform demonstrates exceptional performance in Compliance & Certification, achieving a perfect 100/100 score, and maintains a strong Vulnerability Management rating at 85/100. However, critical security dimensions require significant improvement. Identity & Access Management, API Security, and Infrastructure Security all score below 40, indicating potential vulnerabilities that enterprise security teams should carefully evaluate. Data Protection emerges as a particular concern, with a low 20/100 score suggesting potential gaps in data safeguarding mechanisms. The platform's Breach History shows a clean record with a 100/100 rating, which provides some reassurance. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of Bigtincan's security posture. Security decision-makers should conduct a detailed review and potentially implement additional protective measures to address the identified weaknesses.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Bigtincan Platform presents moderate security risks for financial data management, with an overall security score of 44/100 and a C-grade rating. While the platform demonstrates strong performance in Compliance & Certification (scoring 100/100) and Vulnerability Management (85/100), critical security dimensions require significant improvement. Identity & Access Management, API Security, and Infrastructure Security all score below 40, indicating potential vulnerabilities in protecting sensitive financial information. The platform's Data Protection dimension scores particularly low at 20/100, which could expose organizations to potential data integrity and confidentiality risks. Financial teams considering Bigtincan should carefully evaluate these security gaps, implement additional protective measures, and conduct thorough vendor risk assessments. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of each security parameter and recommended mitigation strategies for financial data protection.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Bigtincan Platform's infrastructure security presents moderate challenges, with an overall security score of 44/100 and a C grade. While the platform demonstrates excellent performance in compliance and certification, achieving a perfect 100/100 score, critical security dimensions reveal significant improvement opportunities. Identity and access management, API security, and infrastructure security each score below 40, indicating potential vulnerabilities that enterprise security teams should carefully evaluate.
The platform's vulnerability management shows strong resilience at 85/100, and a clean breach history provides some confidence. However, the near-zero incident response score raises concerns about the platform's ability to detect and mitigate potential security threats. Organizations considering Bigtincan should conduct thorough due diligence, particularly around access controls and data protection mechanisms.
See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of Bigtincan's security posture across different critical infrastructure domains.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Compare with Alternatives
How does Bigtincan Platform stack up against similar applications in Other Business Software? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.
| Application | Overall ScoreScore↓ | Grade | AI Security 🤖AI 🤖⇅ | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
48/100🏆 | C+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
47/100 | C+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
Bigtincan PlatformCurrent | 44/100 | C | N/A | |
41/100 | C | N/A | View ProfileView | |
38/100 | D+ | N/A | View ProfileView | |
27/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
25/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView |
Security Comparison Insight
5 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.