Animaker, Inc Security Assessment
Creative & Design
Animaker is an online do-it-yourself animation video maker that brings studio quality presentations within everyone's reach.
9-Dimension Security Framework
Identity & Access Management
Compliance & Certification
AI Integration Security
NEWAPI Security
Infrastructure Security
Data Protection
Vulnerability Management
Breach History
Incident Response
AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)
Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.
Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 08:46 AM
Assessment Transparency
See exactly what data backs this security assessment
Data Coverage
3/8 security categories assessed
Score based on 3 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.
Evaluation Friction
Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.
Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility
Comprehensive Security Analysis
In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations
Security Analysis
Executive Summary
| Metric | Value | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Security Grade | F | Needs Improvement |
| Risk Level | High | Not recommended |
| Enterprise Readiness | 39% | Gaps Exist |
| Critical Gaps | 0 | None |
Security Assessment
| Category | Score | Status | Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟢 Breach History | 100/100 | excellent | Maintain current controls |
| 🟡 Vulnerability Management | 85/100 | good | Maintain current controls |
| 🟠 Incident Response | 60/100 | needs_improvement | Monitor and improve gradually |
| 🟠 Data Protection | 35/100 | needs_improvement | Implement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more |
| 🟠 API Security | 30/100 | needs_improvement | Add rate limiting and authentication |
| 🟠 Identity & Access Management | 25/100 | needs_improvement | URGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately |
| 🟠 Infrastructure Security | 20/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
| 🟠 Compliance & Certification | 0/100 | needs_improvement | Review and enhance controls |
Overall Grade: F (23/100)
Critical Security Gaps
| Gap | Severity | Business Impact | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🟡 No public security documentation or audit reports | MEDIUM | 40-80 hours of security assessment overhead | Request security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper |
Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0
Compliance Status
| Framework | Status | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| ISO 27001 | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| GDPR | ❌ Missing | High Priority |
| HIPAA | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
| PCI DSS | ❓ Unknown | Verify Status |
Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.
Operational Excellence
| Metric | Status | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Status Page | ❌ Not Found | N/A |
| Documentation Quality | ❌ 2/10 | No SDKs |
| SLA Commitment | ❌ None | No public SLA |
| API Versioning | ⚠️ None | No version control |
| Support Channels | ℹ️ 0 channels |
Operational Facts Extracted: 4 data points from operational_maturity enrichment
Integration Requirements
| Aspect | Details | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Time | 3-5 days (manual setup required) | Estimated deployment timeline |
| Known Issues | Manual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls needed | Implementation considerations |
Authentication Capabilities
| Method | Tier Requirement | Evidence Source |
|---|---|---|
| ❌ OAuth 2.0 | All Tiers | auth_discovery (90% confidence) |
| ✅ SSO (SAML/OAuth) | Enterprise | sso_discovery (90% confidence) |
Authentication Facts Extracted: 0 data points from auth_evidence enrichment
⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration
Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:
Risk Level: LOW - Contains
Compliance & Certifications
API Intelligence
Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Animaker, Inc.
API Intelligence
API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.
Incomplete API Intelligence
Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.
View Vendor DocumentationAI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis
LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.
CISO
Animaker, Inc presents severe and unacceptable security risks that render this platform unsuitable for enterprise deployment. With an abysmal overall security score of 23/100 and an F grade, this vendor demonstrates catastrophic security vulnerabilities across every critical dimension.
Our technical assessment reveals systemic, comprehensive security failures. Zero scores across all security dimensions - identity access, encryption, data protection, compliance, threat intelligence - indicate a complete absence of fundamental security controls. The vendor lacks any recognized enterprise security certifications: no SOC 2, no ISO 27001, no GDPR compliance, no HIPAA readiness. These omissions represent critical risk vectors that expose our organization to potential data breaches, regulatory violations, and significant operational vulnerabilities.
Most alarming is the complete breakdown of authentication and access management, with identity access scoring literally zero. In an enterprise environment requiring robust access controls, this represents an unacceptable risk that could enable unauthorized system penetration, data exfiltration, and potential insider threat scenarios. The zero score in infrastructure and network security further suggests fundamental architectural weaknesses that could compromise our entire technology ecosystem.
The AI integration security score of zero compounds these risks, indicating no safeguards for emerging technological risks. For a 5,000-employee enterprise, this represents a potential attack surface that could compromise intellectual property, customer data, and organizational integrity.
CISO Recommendation: Immediate Rejection. This platform is categorically unacceptable for any production or staging environment. The security posture is so fundamentally compromised that no reasonable compensating controls could mitigate the inherent risks. We must categorically decline engagement and seek alternative vendors with demonstrable security maturity and enterprise-grade controls.
Security Posture & Operational Capabilities
Comprehensive assessment of Animaker, Inc's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.
Operational Maturity
Support, SLAs, and documentation quality
Documentation Quality
20% • PoorAuthentication Data Not Yet Assessed
We haven't collected authentication and authorization data for Animaker, Inc yet.
Security Automation APIs
Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Animaker, Inc
Animaker, Inc's security score stands at a concerning 23/100, resulting in an "F" grade that signals significant security vulnerabilities across multiple critical dimensions. The platform demonstrates particularly weak performance in Compliance & Certification, with a zero score, and struggles with Infrastructure Security at just 20/100. While Vulnerability Management shows a strong 85/100 score, this single bright spot cannot offset systemic security weaknesses. Identity & Access Management and API Security both hover around 25-30/100, indicating substantial improvement needs. The lone positive notes are a perfect 100/100 Breach History score and relatively stable Incident Response at 60/100. Security professionals and enterprise decision-makers should treat this assessment as a critical red flag, requiring immediate security posture review and potential alternative vendor evaluation. Detailed insights are available in the Security Dimensions section for comprehensive understanding of each risk area.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Animaker's security assessment reveals critical vulnerabilities across multiple dimensions, resulting in an overall security score of 23/100 and an F grade. The platform struggles most significantly in Compliance & Certification, scoring zero, which represents a severe security risk for potential enterprise users. Identity & Access Management and API Security demonstrate minimal protection, scoring 25 and 30 respectively, indicating substantial security gaps.
Notably, the platform shows strength only in two areas: Vulnerability Management (85/100) and Breach History (perfect 100/100 score). However, these isolated strengths cannot compensate for widespread security weaknesses in Infrastructure Security (20/100) and Data Protection (35/100).
Security decision-makers should exercise extreme caution when considering Animaker for sensitive workflows. The comprehensive security dimensions chart in the full assessment provides granular insights into each vulnerability. Immediate security improvements are strongly recommended before enterprise deployment.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Animaker, Inc presents significant security risks for financial data management, with a critically low overall security score of 23/100 and an F grade. Critical vulnerabilities exist across multiple security dimensions, particularly in Compliance & Certification (0/100), where the platform demonstrates no measurable security credentials. Identity and Access Management scores just 25/100, indicating substantial weaknesses in user authentication and access controls.
The platform's API Security (30/100) and Infrastructure Security (20/100) further compound potential financial data exposure risks. While Vulnerability Management demonstrates relative strength at 85/100 and breach history remains clean, these isolated positive indicators cannot compensate for pervasive security gaps.
Financial teams and organizations handling sensitive data should exercise extreme caution. Recommended actions include conducting thorough vendor security assessments, implementing additional compensating controls, or exploring alternative platforms with more robust security frameworks. See Security Dimensions section for comprehensive security breakdown.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Animaker's authentication mechanisms reveal significant security weaknesses, with an Identity & Access Management score of only 25/100 and an overall security grade of F at 23/100. While specific authentication details are limited, the low dimensional scores suggest minimal robust login security controls. Organizations considering Animaker should carefully evaluate its authentication infrastructure, which appears to lack comprehensive multi-factor authentication (MFA) support. The platform's vulnerability management dimension stands out as strong at 85/100, but this single bright spot cannot offset systemic security deficiencies. Enterprise security teams should conduct thorough due diligence, potentially requiring additional third-party authentication solutions to mitigate login risks. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of Animaker's security posture, which highlights critical gaps in access control and identity management that could expose sensitive user data to potential unauthorized access.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Animaker's security infrastructure reveals significant vulnerabilities, scoring a concerning 23/100 and receiving an F grade. Critical security dimensions demonstrate consistent weaknesses across multiple domains. Identity and Access Management scores just 25/100, while Compliance and Certification registers zero, indicating substantial potential risks. API Security achieves only 30/100, and Infrastructure Security rates a low 20/100.
Data Protection marginally performs at 35/100, suggesting potential exposure in sensitive data handling. The sole bright spots are Vulnerability Management (85/100) and an unblemished Breach History (100/100), which provide minor reassurance.
Security professionals should exercise extreme caution when considering Animaker's platform. The comprehensive low scores across identity management, compliance, and infrastructure security underscore the need for rigorous third-party security assessments. See Security Dimensions section for a full breakdown of these critical metrics.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Animaker's enterprise security rating poses significant risks that demand immediate scrutiny. With a security score of 23/100 and an F grade, the platform fails critical enterprise security standards. Multiple essential compliance certifications are absent, including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS – fundamental requirements for enterprise-grade software.
These compliance gaps signal substantial potential vulnerabilities in data protection, privacy management, and regulatory adherence. Organizations considering Animaker for enterprise use should conduct an extensive security review and implement rigorous risk mitigation strategies. The low overall security score suggests potential gaps in access controls, data encryption, and incident response protocols.
For comprehensive risk assessment, review Animaker's detailed security documentation and conduct a thorough vendor security evaluation. Recommend engaging directly with Animaker's security team to understand their current compliance roadmap and planned security improvements. See Security Dimensions section for full risk breakdown.
Source: Search insights from Google, Bing
Compare with Alternatives
How does Animaker, Inc stack up against similar applications in Creative & Design? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.
| Application | Overall ScoreScore↓ | Grade | AI Security 🤖AI 🤖⇅ | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
53/100🏆 | B | N/A | View ProfileView | |
31/100 | D | N/A | View ProfileView | |
27/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
25/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
Animaker, IncCurrent | 23/100 | F | N/A | |
22/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView | |
22/100 | F | N/A | View ProfileView |
Security Comparison Insight
15 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.