Skip to main content
Animaker, Inc logo

Animaker, Inc Security Assessment

Creative & Design

Animaker is an online do-it-yourself animation video maker that brings studio quality presentations within everyone's reach.

Data: 3/8(38%)
SECURITY VERIFIED • SAASPOSTURE • JAN 2026
F
Bottom 20%
Animaker, Inc logoAnimaker, Inc
SaaS Posture Assessment

9-Dimension Security Framework

Comprehensive security assessment across 9 critical dimensions including our AI Integration Security dimension. Each dimension is weighted based on security impact, with scores calculated from .
23
Overall Score
Weighted average across all dimensions
F
Security Grade
Critical
65% confidence

Identity & Access Management

F
Score:0
Weight:33%
Grade:F (Critical)

Compliance & Certification

F
Score:0
Weight:19%
Grade:F (Critical)

AI Integration Security

NEW
N/A
Score:0
Weight:12%
Grade:N/A

API Security

D
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:D (Below Avg)

Infrastructure Security

F
Score:0
Weight:14%
Grade:F (Critical)

Data Protection

D+
Score:0
Weight:10%
Grade:D+ (Below Avg)

Vulnerability Management

A+
Score:0
Weight:3%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Breach History

A+
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A+ (Top 5%)

Incident Response

A
Score:0
Weight:1%
Grade:A (Top 10%)
🤖

AI Integration Security Assessment (9th Dimension)

Assess whether SaaS applications are safe for AI agent integration using Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) standards. Identify Shadow AI risks before they become breaches and make safer AI tool decisions than your competitors.

Last updated: January 17, 2026 at 08:46 AM

Assessment Transparency

See exactly what data backs this security assessment

Data Coverage

3/8 security categories assessed

38%
complete
Identity & Access
Available
Compliance
Missing
API Security
Available
Infrastructure
Available
Data Protection
Missing
Vulnerability Mgmt
Missing
Incident Response
Missing
Breach History
Missing

Score based on 3 of 8 categories. Missing categories could not be assessed due to lack of public data or vendor restrictions.

Evaluation Friction

UNKNOWN
Estimated: Unknown
0% public documentation accessibility

Evaluation friction estimates how long it typically takes to fully evaluate this vendor's security practices, from initial contact to complete assessment.

12 data sources successful

Transparency indicators show data completeness and vendor accessibility

Comprehensive Security Analysis

In-depth assessment with detailed recommendations

Security Analysis

Executive Summary

MetricValueAssessment
Security GradeFNeeds Improvement
Risk LevelHighNot recommended
Enterprise Readiness39%Gaps Exist
Critical Gaps0None

Security Assessment

CategoryScoreStatusAction Required
🟢 Breach History100/100excellentMaintain current controls
🟡 Vulnerability Management85/100goodMaintain current controls
🟠 Incident Response60/100needs_improvementMonitor and improve gradually
🟠 Data Protection35/100needs_improvementImplement encryption at rest, TLS/HTTPS, and 1 more
🟠 API Security30/100needs_improvementAdd rate limiting and authentication
🟠 Identity & Access Management25/100needs_improvementURGENT: Implement compensating controls immediately
🟠 Infrastructure Security20/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls
🟠 Compliance & Certification0/100needs_improvementReview and enhance controls

Overall Grade: F (23/100)

Critical Security Gaps

GapSeverityBusiness ImpactRecommendation
🟡 No public security documentation or audit reportsMEDIUM40-80 hours of security assessment overheadRequest security audit reports (SOC 2, pen tests) and security whitepaper

Total Gaps Identified: 1 | Critical/High Priority: 0

Compliance Status

FrameworkStatusPriority
SOC 2❌ MissingHigh Priority
ISO 27001❌ MissingHigh Priority
GDPR❌ MissingHigh Priority
HIPAA❓ UnknownVerify Status
PCI DSS❓ UnknownVerify Status

Warning: No compliance certifications verified. Extensive due diligence required.

Operational Excellence

MetricStatusDetails
Status Page❌ Not FoundN/A
Documentation Quality❌ 2/10No SDKs
SLA Commitment❌ NoneNo public SLA
API Versioning⚠️ NoneNo version control
Support Channelsℹ️ 0 channels

Operational Facts Extracted: 4 data points from operational_maturity enrichment

Integration Requirements

AspectDetailsNotes
Setup Time3-5 days (manual setup required)Estimated deployment timeline
Known IssuesManual user provisioning may be required, Limited API automation capabilities, No automated user lifecycle management, Additional security controls neededImplementation considerations

Authentication Capabilities

MethodTier RequirementEvidence Source
❌ OAuth 2.0All Tiersauth_discovery (90% confidence)
✅ SSO (SAML/OAuth)Enterprisesso_discovery (90% confidence)

Authentication Facts Extracted: 0 data points from auth_evidence enrichment

⚠️ Inherent Risk Consideration

Data Sensitivity: This application stores sensitive data:

Risk Level: LOW - Contains

Compliance & Certifications

0
Active
0
Pending
6
Not Certified

API Intelligence

Transparency indicators showing API availability and access requirements for Animaker, Inc.

API Intelligence

Incomplete

API intelligence structure found but no operations extracted. May require manual review.

Incomplete API Intelligence

Our automated extraction found API documentation but couldn't extract specific operations. This may require manual review or vendor assistance.

View Vendor Documentation

AI-Powered Stakeholder Decision Analysis

LLM-generated security perspectives tailored to CISO, CFO, CTO, and Legal stakeholder needs. All analysis is grounded in verified API data with zero fabrication.

CISO

Animaker, Inc presents severe and unacceptable security risks that render this platform unsuitable for enterprise deployment. With an abysmal overall security score of 23/100 and an F grade, this vendor demonstrates catastrophic security vulnerabilities across every critical dimension.

Our technical assessment reveals systemic, comprehensive security failures. Zero scores across all security dimensions - identity access, encryption, data protection, compliance, threat intelligence - indicate a complete absence of fundamental security controls. The vendor lacks any recognized enterprise security certifications: no SOC 2, no ISO 27001, no GDPR compliance, no HIPAA readiness. These omissions represent critical risk vectors that expose our organization to potential data breaches, regulatory violations, and significant operational vulnerabilities.

Most alarming is the complete breakdown of authentication and access management, with identity access scoring literally zero. In an enterprise environment requiring robust access controls, this represents an unacceptable risk that could enable unauthorized system penetration, data exfiltration, and potential insider threat scenarios. The zero score in infrastructure and network security further suggests fundamental architectural weaknesses that could compromise our entire technology ecosystem.

The AI integration security score of zero compounds these risks, indicating no safeguards for emerging technological risks. For a 5,000-employee enterprise, this represents a potential attack surface that could compromise intellectual property, customer data, and organizational integrity.

CISO Recommendation: Immediate Rejection. This platform is categorically unacceptable for any production or staging environment. The security posture is so fundamentally compromised that no reasonable compensating controls could mitigate the inherent risks. We must categorically decline engagement and seek alternative vendors with demonstrable security maturity and enterprise-grade controls.

AI-Powered Analysis
Claude Sonnet 4260 wordsZero fabrication

Security Posture & Operational Capabilities

Comprehensive assessment of Animaker, Inc's security posture, operational maturity, authentication capabilities, security automation APIs, and breach intelligence.

🏢

Operational Maturity

Support, SLAs, and documentation quality

Documentation Quality

20% • Poor
🔐

Authentication Data Not Yet Assessed

We haven't collected authentication and authorization data for Animaker, Inc yet.

🤖

Security Automation APIs

Programmatic user management, data operations, and security controls

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Animaker, Inc

Animaker, Inc's security score stands at a concerning 23/100, resulting in an "F" grade that signals significant security vulnerabilities across multiple critical dimensions. The platform demonstrates particularly weak performance in Compliance & Certification, with a zero score, and struggles with Infrastructure Security at just 20/100. While Vulnerability Management shows a strong 85/100 score, this single bright spot cannot offset systemic security weaknesses. Identity & Access Management and API Security both hover around 25-30/100, indicating substantial improvement needs. The lone positive notes are a perfect 100/100 Breach History score and relatively stable Incident Response at 60/100. Security professionals and enterprise decision-makers should treat this assessment as a critical red flag, requiring immediate security posture review and potential alternative vendor evaluation. Detailed insights are available in the Security Dimensions section for comprehensive understanding of each risk area.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Animaker's security assessment reveals critical vulnerabilities across multiple dimensions, resulting in an overall security score of 23/100 and an F grade. The platform struggles most significantly in Compliance & Certification, scoring zero, which represents a severe security risk for potential enterprise users. Identity & Access Management and API Security demonstrate minimal protection, scoring 25 and 30 respectively, indicating substantial security gaps.

Notably, the platform shows strength only in two areas: Vulnerability Management (85/100) and Breach History (perfect 100/100 score). However, these isolated strengths cannot compensate for widespread security weaknesses in Infrastructure Security (20/100) and Data Protection (35/100).

Security decision-makers should exercise extreme caution when considering Animaker for sensitive workflows. The comprehensive security dimensions chart in the full assessment provides granular insights into each vulnerability. Immediate security improvements are strongly recommended before enterprise deployment.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Animaker, Inc presents significant security risks for financial data management, with a critically low overall security score of 23/100 and an F grade. Critical vulnerabilities exist across multiple security dimensions, particularly in Compliance & Certification (0/100), where the platform demonstrates no measurable security credentials. Identity and Access Management scores just 25/100, indicating substantial weaknesses in user authentication and access controls.

The platform's API Security (30/100) and Infrastructure Security (20/100) further compound potential financial data exposure risks. While Vulnerability Management demonstrates relative strength at 85/100 and breach history remains clean, these isolated positive indicators cannot compensate for pervasive security gaps.

Financial teams and organizations handling sensitive data should exercise extreme caution. Recommended actions include conducting thorough vendor security assessments, implementing additional compensating controls, or exploring alternative platforms with more robust security frameworks. See Security Dimensions section for comprehensive security breakdown.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Animaker's authentication mechanisms reveal significant security weaknesses, with an Identity & Access Management score of only 25/100 and an overall security grade of F at 23/100. While specific authentication details are limited, the low dimensional scores suggest minimal robust login security controls. Organizations considering Animaker should carefully evaluate its authentication infrastructure, which appears to lack comprehensive multi-factor authentication (MFA) support. The platform's vulnerability management dimension stands out as strong at 85/100, but this single bright spot cannot offset systemic security deficiencies. Enterprise security teams should conduct thorough due diligence, potentially requiring additional third-party authentication solutions to mitigate login risks. See the Security Dimensions section for a comprehensive breakdown of Animaker's security posture, which highlights critical gaps in access control and identity management that could expose sensitive user data to potential unauthorized access.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Animaker's security infrastructure reveals significant vulnerabilities, scoring a concerning 23/100 and receiving an F grade. Critical security dimensions demonstrate consistent weaknesses across multiple domains. Identity and Access Management scores just 25/100, while Compliance and Certification registers zero, indicating substantial potential risks. API Security achieves only 30/100, and Infrastructure Security rates a low 20/100.

Data Protection marginally performs at 35/100, suggesting potential exposure in sensitive data handling. The sole bright spots are Vulnerability Management (85/100) and an unblemished Breach History (100/100), which provide minor reassurance.

Security professionals should exercise extreme caution when considering Animaker's platform. The comprehensive low scores across identity management, compliance, and infrastructure security underscore the need for rigorous third-party security assessments. See Security Dimensions section for a full breakdown of these critical metrics.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Animaker's enterprise security rating poses significant risks that demand immediate scrutiny. With a security score of 23/100 and an F grade, the platform fails critical enterprise security standards. Multiple essential compliance certifications are absent, including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS – fundamental requirements for enterprise-grade software.

These compliance gaps signal substantial potential vulnerabilities in data protection, privacy management, and regulatory adherence. Organizations considering Animaker for enterprise use should conduct an extensive security review and implement rigorous risk mitigation strategies. The low overall security score suggests potential gaps in access controls, data encryption, and incident response protocols.

For comprehensive risk assessment, review Animaker's detailed security documentation and conduct a thorough vendor security evaluation. Recommend engaging directly with Animaker's security team to understand their current compliance roadmap and planned security improvements. See Security Dimensions section for full risk breakdown.

Source: Search insights from Google, Bing

Compare with Alternatives

How does Animaker, Inc stack up against similar applications in Creative & Design? Click column headers to sort by different criteria.

Application
Score
Grade
AI 🤖
Action
53🏆
BN/AView
31
DN/AView
27
FN/AView
25
FN/AView
23
FN/A
22
FN/AView
22
FN/AView
💡

Security Comparison Insight

15 alternative(s) have higher overall security scores. Review the comparison to understand security tradeoffs for your specific requirements.